Cindy – An Appreciation

Now that the news is out that Cindy McCaffrey is leaving Google, I can post an appreciation. I first met Cindy when I was a cub reporter for MacWeek in 1987. She handled PR for a portion of Apple, and it was my job to try to get anything…

Cindy

Now that the news is out that Cindy McCaffrey is leaving Google, I can post an appreciation. I first met Cindy when I was a cub reporter for MacWeek in 1987. She handled PR for a portion of Apple, and it was my job to try to get anything I could on the company, no matter what. It was Cindy who would call me, exasperated, when I acquired a pre-release version of Apple’s new Mac IIci and published a photo of its motherboard on the front page.

And it was Cindy who campaigned internally on my behalf when I came up with the idea, 15 years later, of writing a book that featured search as its subject and Google as a major narrative actor. With Cindy at the helm of communications and marketing, Google has enjoyed perhaps the most unprecedented run of good press in modern corporate history. (Cindy also sidestepped the marketing excesses of the bubble era, a decision that was not easy to take in 1999-2000). She’s been at Google since the middle of 1999, and certainly deserves the break she plans to take (I believe sailing for a few weeks with her husband is the first item on her agenda). She told me recently that she’s looking forward to reconnecting with family, friends, and “cooking her own dinners.” I wish her well, and expect it won’t be long before we hear from her again. She’s too good – and too restless – to retire forever.

3 Comments on Cindy – An Appreciation

SIGN UP FOR THE NEWSLETTER

Stay up to date on the latest from BattelleMedia.com

Search Paper Fun: Most Cited

I sent a query to Lee Giles, the guru at Penn State behind CiteSeer (with Steve Lawrence, who is now at Google) asking him which search-related papers are the most cited. I was struck by the near parity between Page and Brin's original paper on Google and Jon Kleinberg's…

Scholar LogoI sent a query to Lee Giles, the guru at Penn State behind CiteSeer (with Steve Lawrence, who is now at Google) asking him which search-related papers are the most cited. I was struck by the near parity between Page and Brin’s original paper on Google and Jon Kleinberg’s paper on Hubs and Authorities. Giles did a bit of fiddling with Google Scholar and responded:

For web related work these are well cited in the Google Scholar using the query “web”:

 PDF] The Semantic Web

T Berners-Lee, J Hendler, O Lassila – View as HTML – Cited by 1347

… May 17, 2001. The Semantic Web. A new form of Web content that is meaningful to

computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. … Web: A Research Agenda. …

Scientific American, 2001 – www-personal.si.umich.edu

Read More
1 Comment on Search Paper Fun: Most Cited

Ferguson on Google: Platform? Yes. Single Platform? No.

Charles Ferguson writes a lengthy and clearly considered piece on Google for Tech Review, focusing on the Microsoft angle and concluding that the only way Google can truly "win" is by controlling a new architecture of computing through the time honored approach of proprietary APIs. Ferguson argues that the…

Charles Ferguson writes a lengthy and clearly considered piece on Google for Tech Review, focusing on the Microsoft angle and concluding that the only way Google can truly “win” is by controlling a new architecture of computing through the time honored approach of proprietary APIs. Ferguson argues that the search wars are about to enter a major battle for control of standards which simplify the increasingly heterogeneous world of search, and in such a battle, Microsoft is far better suited.

I enjoyed reading this piece, and I am sure I will read it again and again, to more fully consider its argument. But I find myself disagreeing with the premise – why, in this world of the web, do we need to be bound by this winner takes all approach to the world? It works in a resource constrained world of homogenous PCs – once a consumer has purchased his Windows box, he’s not going to easily purchase an emerging competitor – but somehow, it really doesnt’ strike me as the right metaphor for a Web 2.0 world. I do agree that Google would be well served to make its service more of a platform, and that APIs are the way to go. But I’d really be interested in what Tim O’Reilly has to say about this piece, or Tim Bray, or any number of other folks. I’ll keep my eye out…meanwhile, do read the piece. It’s a worthy provocation.

Other POVs on this piece: TechDirt, Linden, SEW, Silicon Beat

7 Comments on Ferguson on Google: Platform? Yes. Single Platform? No.

Print Implications: Google As Builder

Some folks have been calling me and together we've been pondering the implications of the Google Print announcement. And one drop dead obvious thing dawned on me during the conversations. This is so obvious as to be almost embarrassing to restate, but this program marks a major departure in…

Some folks have been calling me and together we’ve been pondering the implications of the Google Print announcement. And one drop dead obvious thing dawned on me during the conversations.

This is so obvious as to be almost embarrassing to restate, but this program marks a major departure in Google’s overall approach to search. After all, what has been the presumptive model till now? If it’s on the web and publicly available, it’s in the index. That’s why we called it web search, after all. But Gary Price and Chris Sherman, among many others, have reminded us how vast and darkly lit the invisible web is – all that information trapped in the amber of password-protected databases, or crumbling film libraries, or ….books.

Now other companies have taken significant steps toward illuminating these dark corners of the world’s knowledge web – Yahoo with its CAP program, Amazon with A9 and Search Inside the Book. And Google has long claimed that it’s mission was to go beyond the web and crawl the world’s information, wherever it lay.

Read More
15 Comments on Print Implications: Google As Builder

The Market At Work…

Look what comes up as an AdWord when you type in GOOG, which is the stock ticker for Google. Clearly, some enterprising real estate agent thinks the folks at Google are checking their net worth and thinking about buying a house near work…….

Googrealestate

Look what comes up as an AdWord when you type in GOOG, which is the stock ticker for Google. Clearly, some enterprising real estate agent thinks the folks at Google are checking their net worth and thinking about buying a house near work….

3 Comments on The Market At Work…

It’s Only Me, Dave Pell

This is a good stunt. Playing off the traffic from the Geico case, Dave Pell bought the Gieco keyword on Google to drum up some traffic for his blog. Wonder how it'll work?…

PellThis is a good stunt. Playing off the traffic from the Geico case, Dave Pell bought the Gieco keyword on Google to drum up some traffic for his blog. Wonder how it’ll work?

Leave a comment on It’s Only Me, Dave Pell

PubSub InfoP*rn

Pubsub shows the most linked to sites, and the gainers and losers. I'm proud to see Boing Boing way up there!…

PubsubPubsub shows the most linked to sites, and the gainers and losers. I’m proud to see Boing Boing way up there!

Leave a comment on PubSub InfoP*rn

Pell On Google Suggest: Po = Poetry?

Dave Pell checks out Google Suggest and does the one letter test, and the results are fun. He wonders, however: I find it hard to believe that more people who type in the letters P-O are ultimately looking for poetry than porn. That's safesearch for ya!…

Dave Pell checks out Google Suggest and does the one letter test, and the results are fun. He wonders, however:

I find it hard to believe that more people who type in the letters P-O are ultimately looking for poetry than porn.

That’s safesearch for ya!

2 Comments on Pell On Google Suggest: Po = Poetry?

Firefox Users: Less Ad Clicks

This makes sense – Firefox users, who are arguably more sophisticated web surfers, apparently click less on Web ads than those who use Internet Explorer. Firefox blocks pop ups and can be set to block images as well. But I think the real reason is Firefox users know what they…

firefoxThis makes sense – Firefox users, who are arguably more sophisticated web surfers, apparently click less on Web ads than those who use Internet Explorer. Firefox blocks pop ups and can be set to block images as well. But I think the real reason is Firefox users know what they want.

Firefox is clearly the browser of choice for the digerati, and it’s doubled its market share in the past few months. But can it continue?

Slashdot mulls.

Read More
3 Comments on Firefox Users: Less Ad Clicks