Google VP Marketing in Bizweek
August 7, 2007
Interview here. Have not had time to grok but thought you all might...
Interview here. Have not had time to grok but thought you all might...
Reader Ed Brenegar writes: This is a year to change the customer relations game. With less commerce happening, presumably, there is more time for interaction. That interaction has to build the relationships...»
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything... including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:
More coming soon...

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Powered by:
Movable Type 4.24-en
All contents copyright © 2003 - 2009 John Battelle. | Terms of Service and Privacy Policies
Comments
Couple of my reactions, FWIW:
Have you ever done any brand advertising just for Google?We do a lot of direct marketing. But not brand marketing.
Oh, yeah? And what about the advertisements on PBS, during Nova? Where the Google advertisement shows someone using the Google search engine to find information about "string theory" and "Egyptology"? Is that not brand marketing? Fine, it's not a superbowl commercial. It is much more targeted to the PBS audience. But I don't see how this guy can claim that this PBS/Nova commercial is not a brand marketing.
And I vaguely remember hearing a similar type of Google commercial/Google branding ad on NPR, once, too.
So I do not see how this guy can claim that Google does not do brand marketing. I have seen it.
You can't say you're innovative. You actually have to be innovative. The best marketing for innovation is to put out a new product or improvement every two weeks. We're releasing stuff almost every day. That's much better than an ad saying we're innovative.
Here I disagree as well. Innovation does not mean releasing a new product every two weeks. Much of what gets released on a regular basis seems trivial and uninteresting to me. Incremental improvements that don't really change they way I work on a daily basis. However, that doesn't mean that Google doesn't innovate. I think they do a fantastic job with the infrastructure they've built, the MapReduce and their massive computational grid. That is some praiseworthy innovation. It is just a longer-term, less publicly visible aspect of the company.
But this whole "we are releasing something every two weeks" story? Not really a good measure of innovation, IMHO.
Leave a comment