John Battelle's Searchblog

I don't understand... was any of this somehow against the rules? Shouldn't it be up to the designers of the auction to set it up to give maximum benefit to taxpayers? I'm glad the open-access rules took effect.

It should also come as no surprise to find out that Verizon is among the top donors to the US Reps who are raising a fuss about nothing.

These Republicans must be getting paid by Verizon, who's crying coz they paid more than they bargain for. These politicians are pretending that without Goog, there would be more participants in the auction. These other participants would be dropping like flies anyway when they don't have the resource to bid when it gets to the serious bidding. Thus, the FCC would not have the "highest" bid that it did with Googgle playing coy with Verizon. Now Verizon is crying to these politicians, who are in their pockets, for paying more than what less qualified bidders/competitiors. This is question quantity versus quality that have guaranteed less money if these politicians and Verizon have their way. Shame on these politicians for not recognizing that us consumers won out on this auction. I hope their constituency recognize that they are being shortchange by their supposed representative. Are they representing them or their interest group?

Here's Google from the horse's mouth:

"Google's top priority heading into the auction was to make sure that bidding on the so-called "C Block" reached the $4.6 billion reserve price that would trigger the important "open applications" and "open handsets" license conditions. We were also prepared to gain the nationwide C Block licenses at a price somewhat higher than the reserve price; in fact, for many days during the early course of the auction, we were the high bidder. But it was clear, then and now, that Verizon Wireless ultimately was motivated to bid higher (and had far more financial incentive to gain the licenses).

"You may remember that as the FCC was setting rules for the auction last summer, we urged the Commission to adopt four openness conditions. Further, we vowed to bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the Commission adopted all four rules. Even though the FCC ultimately agreed to only two of the conditions, which nullified our original pledge, we still believed it was important to demonstrate through action our commitment to a more open wireless world.

"We're glad that we did. Based on the way that the bidding played out, our participation in the auction helped ensure that the C Block met the reserve price. In fact, in ten of the bidding rounds we actually raised our own bid -- even though no one was bidding against us -- to ensure aggressive bidding on the C Block. In turn, that helped increase the revenues raised for the U.S. Treasury, while making sure that the openness conditions would be applied to the ultimate licensee."

http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/04/cone-of-silence-finally-lifts-on.html

Lest we forget.

The time to complain about this auction was when Google was lobbying for the open access rules.

Wait - why is this congressman even care about this auction - he should be worried about his district

http://www.state.mi.us/MSP/CJIC/crime/violent99/district6.htm

which seems to be heading in the wrong direction. Unless ofcourse the Verizon peeps have their hand in the good ole congressman's pocket -

am i wrong ?

go back to work.