Powered by Rollyo

Recent Comment
Spotlight

  • Reader Sam writes: The police were doing their duty. As they are required by law. Google had to cough up the IP. As they are required by law. And now suddenly Google is evil? Wow! It is the job of a court of that country to decide what is legally right or wrong. Not Google or America. [go]

Recent Comments

  • gaurav: " I am seriously impressed with your knowl ..." [go]
  • Ray P.: " Another Me Too! Did what most ..." [go]
  • bill: " It still has to be good search. I tried ..." [go]
  • nmw: " Please connect these dots: 1. CBS + CNe ..." [go]
  • nmw: " AFAIK, Google's focus is on being a prof ..." [go]
  • John Battelle: " @Sam: You have a point, but I worry, ALO ..." [go]
  • John Battelle: " I am not sure this is only a gimmick. Mo ..." [go]
  • Michael Cohn: " No matter who owns the ad server in ques ..." [go]
  • stone: " It's a terrible idea, widely criticized ..." [go]
  • Adam: " Ok, I've waited for headlines, but all I ..." [go]
  • Sam: " See, this guy made some derogatory and v ..." [go]
  • Polyester Kabin: " eyvallah saolasın eline sağlık : ) ..." [go]
  • John Battelle: " Thanks Sean, good idea. We are pretty mu ..." [go]
  • Sean Ammirati: " John, I attended your last event in San ..." [go]
  • BuyRosevillePottery.com: " You should DEFINITELY complain. Even if ..." [go]
  • JG: " Air travel in the US is starting to f ..." [go]

PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'

thesearch_bookcover.jpg

Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...

You can also buy the audio version here.

Check my book page for more info.

Blogger's Rights

Top Posts

Active Topics

Monthly Archives

About John Battelle

Searchblog Newsletter

Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:

Calendar

May 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Syndicate

Powered by

August 16, 2005 7:58 AM

Danny: Screw Size

A fine piece of Jesus Not Again writing from Danny. I'm deep in this as well, as those of you who've read my previous posts know. And more is coming, but I promise, I will be brief as can be. I'm waiting to talk with a couple more folks. Danny notes he and Gary will also be posting more later in the week. I agree with Danny that relevance is key, but think it's nearly impossible to set a standard for relevance - it's too subjective. I disagree that size is not important. Once we can figure out how to audit and count size, it's important, as important as UI, speed, or algorithms. It's also important in a business sense - it's a number that folks pay attention to and that marketers know works, and that the mainstream press will parrot. Even if you disagree with the tactics, and I do, it's still important....

  • Posted by John Battelle on August 16, 2005 7:58 AM

  • remember this »
  • Sphere It

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Danny: Screw Size:

» I am 344, hear me roar from Many-to-Many
Feedster launched the Feedster Top 500 setting a new standard for length, the first salvo in the size matters war of microcontent. Go here and bitch about M2M isn't on the list, but my crappy blog is, or if... [Read More]

» Ligue o rádio, cara! from De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum
Fonte: Aqui, cara. Ligue o rádio que tem coisa boa para se ouvir! A dica foi do William Pooley. Claudio... [Read More]

Comments

I've written a post pointing out

Flaws in NCSA Yahoo/Google study

I've dug into some of the study's data, and written an initial
quick blog post to point out two bad flaws. The methodology used does
indeed have a selective bias, towards both:
1) search-engine spam pages, and 2) large word lists.

Briefly, by using searches for random words from a large
wordlist, that created a tendency to select *large* *wordlists*, and
also gibberish spam pages which happened to have those words (probably
derived from the same large wordlists). Moreover, this effect applies
(to some extent) to *every* *search* *sample*. In fact, many of the
searches could be repeatedly selecting the *same wordlist file*,
or similar. Since either Google had more large wordlists indexed, or
Yahoo eliminated many of them as useless data, this results in an
extremely misleading conclusion about the relative size of their databases.

In effect, the outcome is that a relatively small number of
dubious documents are being repeatedly sampled, rather than any sort
of comprehensive examination.

It's good to have your analytical posts back again, thank you :)

Leave a comment

Sponsors

Searchblog Classifieds!

Searchblog, in paperback

Categories

Search Resources

License