Recent Comment
Spotlight
- Reader Michael Megalli writes: It is difficult to engage in genuine conversations with the marketplace when you can't change the reality of how a company does business, what it sells, how it works with partners, etc. [go]
Recent Comments
- JG: " The other question (whether it is mor ..." [go]
- Tom Nocera: " First, my hat is off to whomever at Fede ..." [go]
- Ciaran: " A few years back Google started giving o ..." [go]
- prefabrik yapı: " çok teşekkürler john cok güzel bi yaklas ..." [go]
- Steve Rhodes: " Google did underwrite Nova in 2005/6. ..." [go]
- Joel Fugazzotto: " What a nice post! It's a reminder to us ..." [go]
- nmw: " OMG -- not YET another post! :O (the pr ..." [go]
- SorenG: " Works for me. Curious how often the Zapr ..." [go]
- nmw: " Yes, I have to admit -- we still ..." [go]
- John Battelle: " @michael - I think there is a difference ..." [go]
- Michael Cohn: " Don't you think there's a difference bet ..." [go]
- JG: " This is one point, JG, where I think ..." [go]
- pz: " Glad ya'll are out there to inform us of ..." [go]
- David Mullings: " I know that if someone created a fan pag ..." [go]
- nmw: " This is one point, JG, where I think< ..." [go]
- JG: " google lets you play with the machine ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 35 comments: WTF??!!! (04.17)
- 26 comments: Twitter. Oh God. (04.30)
- 16 comments: The Future of Search Series (05.08)
- 16 comments: The Music In Magazines (05.07)
- 13 comments: Google. Does. Not Market. Except When It Does. (05.15)
Monthly Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate
Powered by
December 14, 2004 8:36 PM
Ferguson on Google: Platform? Yes. Single Platform? No.
Charles Ferguson writes a lengthy and clearly considered piece on Google for Tech Review, focusing on the Microsoft angle and concluding that the only way Google can truly "win" is by controlling a new architecture of computing through the time honored approach of proprietary APIs. Ferguson argues that the search wars are about to enter a major battle for control of standards which simplify the increasingly heterogeneous world of search, and in such a battle, Microsoft is far better suited.
I enjoyed reading this piece, and I am sure I will read it again and again, to more fully consider its argument. But I find myself disagreeing with the premise - why, in this world of the web, do we need to be bound by this winner takes all approach to the world? It works in a resource constrained world of homogenous PCs - once a consumer has purchased his Windows box, he's not going to easily purchase an emerging competitor - but somehow, it really doesnt' strike me as the right metaphor for a Web 2.0 world. I do agree that Google would be well served to make its service more of a platform, and that APIs are the way to go. But I'd really be interested in what Tim O'Reilly has to say about this piece, or Tim Bray, or any number of other folks. I'll keep my eye out...meanwhile, do read the piece. It's a worthy provocation.
Other POVs on this piece: TechDirt, Linden, SEW, Silicon Beat
- Posted by John Battelle on December 14, 2004 8:36 PM
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ferguson on Google: Platform? Yes. Single Platform? No.:
» Google and the Great Mousetrap Fallacy from Orange Hues blog
This is perhaps the most interesting look at Google but it is clearly written with a Microsoft bias. How Microsoft works, how do companies succeed or fail against it, what should Google do to tackle Microsoft and so on. The purpose of this post is just... [Read More]
- Tracked on December 19, 2004 10:41 AM
» Googlecalifragilisticexpialidocious from Relax, Everything Is Deeply Intertwingled
Until this typepad post, there was exactly one Google hit for the nonwordGooglecalifragilisticexpialidocious.It was a link to What Would Jesus Google? For what it's worth, until this typepad post, there was also exactly one Yahoo hit, one MSN hit, and [Read More]
- Tracked on December 22, 2004 12:08 AM
Comments
I think the real point is not that we need that sort of architecture, its that its inevitable, and whoever creates it will have market dominance. Netscape was right when it assumed the market didn't need proprietary standards. It was wrong when it assumed that Microsoft wasn't going to create them and wipe out Netscape. Google is wrong if it assumes Microsoft won't try the same tactic.
Talk of APIs is interesting, but I would focus more on the architectural evolution that needs to take place, and the opportunities this evolution provides.
For instance, enterprise search is Google's weakest link, and possibly MS's strongest opportunity, due to its command of the desktop and workgroup.
At the web level, the architecture has to decentralize somehow. For instance, I could write a genome search engine right now, but I don't have the resources to crawl the entire web looking for FASTA files. I need something like a subscription to a comprehensive web crawl. Likewise, others need data, or indexing, or other pieces to get their ideas to work. There's a big opportunity to standardize and publish the different layers of search services.
I find something unappealing about a standard API for search.
This isn't like defining a standard API for accessing webservers or databases - this API is effectively trying to define the interface between people and machines and I dont believe we've got that one worked out just yet.
I'd hate to see innovation in this area stunted by widespread adoption of the lowest-common denominator approach of "user provides a string of two or three words", "server responds with first results of 'n' thousand".
Can anyone access the article - appears to have been down all day today...
I thought the following sentence from Mr. Ferguson's article was interesting:
"In late 2004, however, Google announced APIs for its advertising systems and for the Google Deskbar."
I found references to the deskbar API, but I can't find any mention of an AdWords API on Google. This has been a much-requested item by users of the google's current web api.
Anyone have a link?
Thanks,
Chris
I think Ferguson is wrong on a number of points. He writes solely from the Microsoft perspective and demonstrates little acknowledgement or understanding of how Google grew so fast over the past few years.
I wrote a long post on it's unlikely that MSN and Yahoo! are going to win over Google's customers. Google and the Great Mousetrap Fallacy.
I think Microsoft can win almost any battle.
Leave a comment