My, it’s a busy time in the search biz. I’m still in Europe and the schedule is quite demanding here, so my postings will be light. I will have some news tonight, and hope to get to a longer analysis of video search shortly. Meantime, much buzz about this Sci Am article…thanks to the many readers who have pinged me asking where the hell I am…
Quick Update
My, it's a busy time in the search biz. I'm still in Europe and the schedule is quite demanding here, so my postings will be light. I will have some news tonight, and hope to get to a longer analysis of video search shortly. Meantime, much buzz about this…
What’s interesting is the lack of technical accuracy:
I don’t have time to delve into why this is goofy, but it’s both vague and wrong, unless there’s been a revolution in how inverted indices work.
OK more time now…
His description of link analysis is off too. He confuses Kleinberg’s HITS algorithm with Pagerank.
This guy had written a blurb earlier about search, and I assumed that someone had warned the editors, but now he has a full article that repeats the same mistakes.