<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/">
<title>John Battelle&apos;s Searchblog</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/</link>
<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-30T07:59:26-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002279.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002278.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002276.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002275.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002274.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002273.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002272.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002271.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002270.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002269.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002268.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002267.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002266.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002264.php" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002263.php" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002279.php">
<title>Google Gets Social</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002279.php</link>
<description> Who says Google doesn&apos;t play the tagging, sharing, social search game? Not Google. Today it released a new version of its toolbar that&apos;s very....well...Web 2.0. From SEW coverage: Google has enhanced its toolbar for Internet Explorer, introducing several new features that will appeal to regular users of the program. The new features include enhanced &quot;suggestions&quot; that appear on the fly as you type a query, the ability to add custom buttons to search your favorite sites, the ability to create and save online bookmarks and to share web pages with others. &quot;One of the areas we wanted to focus on was to empower users more,&quot; said Sundar Pichai, Google group product manager....</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-30T07:59:26-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002278.php">
<title>Can&apos;t Keep Up On China?</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002278.php</link>
<description> Nor can I. Thank God for Rebecca....</description>
<dc:subject>Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-29T21:02:49-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002276.php">
<title>Mazda Says: Thanks for the Idea</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002276.php</link>
<description> Remember how Pontiac was pushing its line of cars by asking you to &quot;Google Pontiac&quot;? (See here for the background). In my post, I wrote: Now, when I Google Pontiac, I see two sponsored links up top, both from Pontiac (if I were, say, Toyota, I might just think about bidding that keyword....but I digress). Well, Toyota didn&apos;t take the bait, but Mazda sure did....</description>
<dc:subject>Random, But Interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-28T10:33:12-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002275.php">
<title>The Real Irony Here...</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002275.php</link>
<description> ...is that Google is, for the first time, being a content editor. I&apos;ve written extensively about how Google, by its very DNA, does not like to be an editor of content. But in China, it&apos;s doing exactly that. (SEW) Google&apos;s first big editing job? Deciding which sites to exclude because they might offend the Chinese government. There&apos;s still time to pull out, guys. I&apos;ve read your rationalizations, and Uncle Bill&apos;s as well. I don&apos;t buy them. I don&apos;t buy that this is what, in your heart, you believe is right. Sure, I understand the logic. But, well....in your heart, is this what you wanted to do? No? Then why did you do it? I was having dinner with some dear friends tonight. They asked me why did Google do this? My answer: I think they convinced themselves it was the right thing to do. They thought themselves into it. And deep down, they aren&apos;t sure they did the right thing. At least, that&apos;s what I want to believe. Sure, Microsoft is going to go in. Yahoo and IBM are going to go in. But Google? We thought...well, we thought you were different....</description>
<dc:subject>Joints After Midnight &amp; Rants</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-28T00:28:02-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002274.php">
<title>So Much News</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002274.php</link>
<description> That this slipped by: Google AdSense begins rich media beta test. In other words, &quot;floating ads&quot;, interstitials, and expanding ads...oh my!...</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-27T16:55:56-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002273.php">
<title>Kosmix</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002273.php</link>
<description> I&apos;m speaking with these guys next week. For now, you can read about them here....(SiliconBeat) Meet Anand Rajaraman and Venky Harinarayan, two of the co-founders at Junglee, and who twice seriously considered acquiring Google in its early days, but decided their friend Brin was too bold, if not arrogant, to deal with. Now they plan to officially launch an ambitious search engine company, Kosmix at the Demo conference to begin the week of Feb 6 in Phoenix. They&apos;ve also raised $7.4 million in venture capital. They are making an audaciously risky bet that they can crack the code on a vexing problem in search: finding the meaning, or at least the topic of a Web page....</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-27T16:22:04-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002272.php">
<title>What Info Does Google Keep?</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002272.php</link>
<description> A reader asked me: Does Google keep logs of searches correlated with IP address or other personally identifiable information for users who have not logged in? I knew it kept parts of this data, but was not sure. So I pinged Google PR, which checked in for me (thanks!). The response was to quote Google&apos;s privacy FAQ: Like most Web sites, our servers automatically record the page requests made when users visit our sites. These &quot;server logs&quot; typically include your web request, Internet Protocol address, browser type, browser language, the date and time of your request and one or more cookies that may uniquely identify your browser. In other words, yes, Google does record this data. But, does it KEEP that data, I asked? The answer: Yes, we do. It&apos;s simple to stop this, of course, just set your browser to not accept cookies. But if you do, you lose out on the services that cookies enable. I for one keep my cookies intact. But know that yes, your data is kept by Google and yes, your searches can be correlated to IP data....</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-27T14:59:05-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002271.php">
<title>Ugh. This Just Doesn&apos;t Feel Good, Does It?</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002271.php</link>
<description> Who wants to have stories like this written? It just feels so ... wrong. A day after Google&apos;s buggy censorship of sites for Chinese-users was revealed, the search giant has responded by fixing its filters so topics such as beer and jokes are no longer deleted. An investigation published Thursday by CNET News.com showed that Google&apos;s new China search engine not only censored criticisms of the Chinese government, but went further than similar services from Microsoft and Yahoo by targeting sites related to teen pregnancy, alcohol, dating and homosexuality. On Friday morning, however, those previously verboten sites became available through Google.cn. That brings Google&apos;s filtering in line with blacklists used by Microsoft and Yahoo. But it&apos;s worse. For more, read Gary, and Philipp. In short, Google used to have a page in its help area that said this: But now it says this: . Update: Google explains its policy of engagement here. Update 2: Google&apos;s new explanation of its censorship policy is up (SEW)....</description>
<dc:subject>Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-27T14:01:28-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002270.php">
<title>But There&apos;s Always Music....</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002270.php</link>
<description> In a PDF report (download from Searchblog), Bear Stearns Analyst Robert Peck speculates that Google will launch a music store soon. Sure they will, and it will take lessons from video. Gary Price groks it here. From Peck&apos;s report: Why is Google Tunes attractive to Google? According to Nielsen/Net ratings, unique visitors to Apple&amp;#8217;s iTunes site increased 241% YoY to 20.7M, for a 14% reach. Further, Nielsen indicates that iTunes users form a distinct target audience with brand preferences along autos, alcohol beverages, magazines, and television. *** We would expect Google to rollout a Beta service within 3-6 months. We note that Google has not confirmed our expectations, and that our thinking is based on Mosaic theory. However, we do think this fits with Google&apos;s recent moves and its ultimate goal of organizing the world&apos;s information....</description>
<dc:subject>Media/Tech Business Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-26T21:26:39-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002269.php">
<title>Video Store: Yeah, We Blew It</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002269.php</link>
<description> From the Seattle PI: &quot;We made a big mistake,&quot; Mayer, who oversees all of Google&apos;s search products, said Tuesday. &quot;You can&apos;t come out and launch a product like Google Video and say &apos;CSI&apos; and &apos;Survivor&apos; are there if they&apos;re not on the home page.&quot;...</description>
<dc:subject>Media/Tech Business Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-26T10:21:36-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002268.php">
<title>Google China: Congress Wakes Up</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002268.php</link>
<description> I&apos;m still thinking about this, but this is an interesting development. Yahoo and Microsoft can go into China no problem, but once Google does, then the US Congress gets into the act....</description>
<dc:subject>Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-26T10:20:23-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002267.php">
<title>Yahoo: All About My?</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002267.php</link>
<description> Om reports from a Yahoo retreat (I wanted to go, but had a school board meeting, sounds like it was really interesting!). My contention is that forget search, because Yahoo has something better than that. My.Yahoo.Com is no longer a portal page, but instead an &amp;#8220;attention page&amp;#8221; which can be and should be leveraged to become the aggregator site for complicated digital life. I consider search the interface for all this, in fact. Om also notes that Yahoo&apos;s new Chief Product Officer, Ash Patel, is a recent Mac convert....</description>
<dc:subject>Media/Tech Business Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-26T08:07:47-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002266.php">
<title>HumpDay</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002266.php</link>
<description> Long week here in Searchblog land. And much, much happening. Here&apos;s my roundup. I am working on longer posts on Google/China and Nexidia (an interesting phonetic search company) but running out of steam for today. FM, the company we&apos;re building so that creating Searchblog-like sites is easier, is taking a lot of time right now, but I expect that to slow a bit later in the month. Meanwhile.... Andy finds an odd Googlebug. Seems to push IE users to download Google Desktop. More here. Slate has fun with the Google/DOJ story - some good editorial cartoons. Click around (thanks Bill). B2.0 names Google the smartest company this past year. But the company also is mentioned in the &quot;Dumbest&quot; category too. Mary Meeker (MorganStanley) groks the DOJ implications. PDF download. Google, Sun, others join &quot;StopBadware&quot; campaign. Yahoo says, Are You Kidding? (In response to reports it has given up on catching Google). The host of Xooglers gets busted for violating AdSense TOS. Oh, the wonderful irony. TechCrunch has the scoop on new Windows Live services at MSFT&apos;s search champ camp.Speaking of which, MSFT announced two new labs (via SEW) as well, one focused on Search... YPN (Yahoo&apos;s AdSense competitor) will be gearing up this Spring, here&apos;s a list of how. Brin defends his position on China. Dan Gilmor learns in public, reminds us why we like him so much BigDaddy (Google&apos;s next big algo update?)...</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-25T22:47:50-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002264.php">
<title>Pontiac Says: Google Proves It</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002264.php</link>
<description> GM says Google Pontiac. Perhaps the first time a major (and I mean really major) marketer has used search marketing so directly in a television campaign. From the MediaPost coverage: Television ads often stimulate Internet search behavior by increasing brand awareness or sparking curiosity, as often demonstrated by Hitwise. But this GM spot was significant because it ended with an unusual call to action: &quot;Don&apos;t take our word for it. Google Pontiac and discover for yourself.&quot; And the ad ended not with a URL or phone number for a local dealer, but an actual Google screenshot with Pontiac typed in. This is a regional campaign, and certainly demonstrates how Google has become an authority/integrity call to action for marketers. Screenshot here. Now, when I Google Pontiac, I see two sponsored links up top, both from Pontiac (if I were, say, Toyota, I might just think about bidding that keyword....but I digress). In any case, since many folks have no idea that those blue shaded links are in fact ads, I am sure that they are going to be making Google a lot of money over the course of this campaign. Innaresting....</description>
<dc:subject>Random, But Interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-25T22:14:13-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002263.php">
<title>Here Comes Google China</title>
<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/002263.php</link>
<description> As reported earlier, Google decided to go into China a while ago. I spoke to Sergey about this very question a year ago, and he expressed his reservations and his thinking - on balance, Google in China, even if it&apos;s playing by the Chinese government&apos;s rules, is a good thing. Weds, Google will make it official (Seattle PI). They&apos;re in - they&apos;re not standing up to the Chinese government. (Apparently, the DOJ and Wall St., Google can say no to. China....not so much.) The site will be google.cn (not live yet)....</description>
<dc:subject>Of Note in Search Biz</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-24T22:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>