Comments on: On Coming Back to FMP

By: Fawd Noor

Fawd Noor — Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:51:00 +0000

It is just a troubling concern the fact that concern is actually even posed. A better solution is actually so accurate so plausible that him and i become startled through it’s convenience. You private the correct to sieve “Your” give food to. I am within requiring you to inquire this specific concern because of the misalignment of interest which are present. We are add value to companies/products which usually do not work with Us.
Thanks…………………………..///////
Education Information

By: RacerRick

RacerRick — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:23:00 +0000

Congrats and best of luck!

By: Hank Campbell

Hank Campbell — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:22:00 +0000

Hi John,

Congratulations! I was a fan early on but while FM got more successful it also became more of a remnant network and so ends up being in the remnant chain. I hope the new vision takes FM back to being a valuable partner for publishers who don’t have 80 million impressions a month but still do pretty well – and don’t want to hire a sales force.

By: Brian Wetjen

Brian Wetjen — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:14:00 +0000

Thank you for the update, and all the best to you moving forward! Particularly happy about the return of a regular FM Signal. If that didn’t return, I was going to rally support for bringing back The Industry Standard!

By: johnbattelle

johnbattelle — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:57:00 +0000

Thanks Leona!

By: Leona Laurie

Leona Laurie — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 06:29:00 +0000

John, there is something so exciting about this. Welcome back!

By: johnbattelle

johnbattelle — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:15:00 +0000

As am I, thanks Gian!

By: Gian Fulgoni

Gian Fulgoni — Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:54:00 +0000

Welcome back, John. Looking forward to the next chapter of FM!

By: Wayne Blodwell

Wayne Blodwell — Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:43:00 +0000

Good luck John.

By: johnbattelle

johnbattelle — Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:41:00 +0000

Thank you for that.