<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweets Belong To The User&#8230;.And Words Are Complicated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW Goldberg &#124; Social Media Marketing Expert : What is a tweet?</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-31825</link>
		<dc:creator>RW Goldberg &#124; Social Media Marketing Expert : What is a tweet?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-31825</guid>
		<description>[...] John Battelle hits on an interesting argument with regards to the &#8220;ongoing legal battle with a Manhattan court over the legal status of tweets posted by an Occupy Wall St. protestor&#8221;: who owns tweets? Battelle&#8217;s post title says &#8220;Tweets belong to the user&#8221; but I&#8217;m not so sure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Battelle hits on an interesting argument with regards to the &#8220;ongoing legal battle with a Manhattan court over the legal status of tweets posted by an Occupy Wall St. protestor&#8221;: who owns tweets? Battelle&#8217;s post title says &#8220;Tweets belong to the user&#8221; but I&#8217;m not so sure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter’s dilemma: We own our tweets, but it still wants to control them &#171; MediaStreet News &#38; Opinions</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-31117</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter’s dilemma: We own our tweets, but it still wants to control them &#171; MediaStreet News &#38; Opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-31117</guid>
		<description>[...] Media founder John Battelle noted in a recent post that the company’s argument in the Occupy case raises a host of questions about what it means when a user owns their content, and what responsibilities that should impose on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media founder John Battelle noted in a recent post that the company’s argument in the Occupy case raises a host of questions about what it means when a user owns their content, and what responsibilities that should impose on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter&#8217;s dilemma: We own our tweets, but it still wants to control them &#8212; Tech News and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-31042</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter&#8217;s dilemma: We own our tweets, but it still wants to control them &#8212; Tech News and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-31042</guid>
		<description>[...] founder John Battelle noted in a recent post that the company&#8217;s argument in the Occupy case raises a host of questions about what it means when a user owns their content, and what responsibilities that should impose on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] founder John Battelle noted in a recent post that the company&#8217;s argument in the Occupy case raises a host of questions about what it means when a user owns their content, and what responsibilities that should impose on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading about eReading this week 9/10/2012 &#171; Allegany County Library System Director&#039;s Notes</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30651</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading about eReading this week 9/10/2012 &#171; Allegany County Library System Director&#039;s Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30651</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweets Belong To The User….And Words Are Complicated Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.    Categories: ereading, libraries, publishing, Social Networks        Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweets Belong To The User….And Words Are Complicated Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.    Categories: ereading, libraries, publishing, Social Networks        Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbattelle</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30643</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbattelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30643</guid>
		<description>Arguing for the heck of it, but…how would Twitter know if I am using a client that passes my tweets to Twitter, but also does other things with it, like passing those same words (not the tweet, but the words) to other applications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing for the heck of it, but…how would Twitter know if I am using a client that passes my tweets to Twitter, but also does other things with it, like passing those same words (not the tweet, but the words) to other applications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perryevans</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30642</link>
		<dc:creator>perryevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30642</guid>
		<description>agree that this feels like the BIG question.  I presume that a large part of Twitter&#039;s offensive posture on client app is to close off the &quot;entry point&quot; from becoming a point of alternate distribution.  When you own the point of content entry, it&#039;s a LOT more complicated to invoke re-distribution. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree that this feels like the BIG question.  I presume that a large part of Twitter&#8217;s offensive posture on client app is to close off the &#8220;entry point&#8221; from becoming a point of alternate distribution.  When you own the point of content entry, it&#8217;s a LOT more complicated to invoke re-distribution. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbattelle</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30641</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbattelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30641</guid>
		<description>I agree that what you argue makes sense, but the Terms are not crystal clear on this. They say &quot;you own your own Content&quot;….and it&#039;s pretty easy to conflate Content with Tweets. However, it&#039;s clear that can&#039;t be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that what you argue makes sense, but the Terms are not crystal clear on this. They say &#8220;you own your own Content&#8221;….and it&#8217;s pretty easy to conflate Content with Tweets. However, it&#8217;s clear that can&#8217;t be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Walker</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30637</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30637</guid>
		<description>John,

As I posted on my blog, there must be a distinction made between the content and its associated tweet. 

The ToS is clear on the user owning the content but Twitter HAS to own the Tweet. I think this is the only way they can reconcile the user ownership of content with the ability to enforce tweet display rules via the API. 

The content isn&#039;t a tweet on its own - it&#039;s just words, the tweet is created by the service when the standard format is applied to the user content. The tweet is the combination of content + presentation + functionality + metadata such as conversation information. 

http://colinwalker.me.uk/2012/09/what-is-a-tweet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>As I posted on my blog, there must be a distinction made between the content and its associated tweet. </p>
<p>The ToS is clear on the user owning the content but Twitter HAS to own the Tweet. I think this is the only way they can reconcile the user ownership of content with the ability to enforce tweet display rules via the API. </p>
<p>The content isn&#8217;t a tweet on its own &#8211; it&#8217;s just words, the tweet is created by the service when the standard format is applied to the user content. The tweet is the combination of content + presentation + functionality + metadata such as conversation information. </p>
<p><a href="http://colinwalker.me.uk/2012/09/what-is-a-tweet/" rel="nofollow">http://colinwalker.me.uk/2012/09/what-is-a-tweet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a tweet?</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30636</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a tweet?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30636</guid>
		<description>[...] John Battelle hits on an interesting argument with regards to the &#8220;ongoing legal battle with a Manhattan court over the legal status of tweets posted by an Occupy Wall St. protestor&#8221;: who owns tweets? Battelle&#8217;s post title says &#8220;Tweets belong to the user&#8221; but I&#8217;m not so sure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Battelle hits on an interesting argument with regards to the &#8220;ongoing legal battle with a Manhattan court over the legal status of tweets posted by an Occupy Wall St. protestor&#8221;: who owns tweets? Battelle&#8217;s post title says &#8220;Tweets belong to the user&#8221; but I&#8217;m not so sure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbattelle</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/09/tweets-belong-to-the-user-and-words-are-complicated.php#comment-30634</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbattelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6717#comment-30634</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that. In any case, the implication of &quot;owning your own tweets&quot; stands no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that. In any case, the implication of &#8220;owning your own tweets&#8221; stands no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
