Comments on: On Larry Page’s Letter: Super Amazing Great Tremendous!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 May 2012 03:14:00 +0000

they’re all written by PR, but if Larry didn’t like it, it wouldn’t have made it to the press. It’s no doubt he wanted it to sound nice. note that he only made a cameo in the first earning call, in the next one, he stayed to answer a couple of questions. He’s grown up. He was asked about G+ real name debacle at zeitgeist, and he said some gobbledygook and totally avoided answering the question. and no, I don’t think his press officer prepared the answer for him. He can do corporate speak when he wants to.

By: Tim Hawkins

Tim Hawkins — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:52:00 +0000

noteable pop at apple on the “synching” issue. Surprised there is only one but even with such a warm & fuzzy piece of PR the truth never lies!

By: Shava Nerad

Shava Nerad — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:38:00 +0000

Just another example of how Google is not a social media company. They can’t do authentic if prodded with a stick. They think Vic Gundotra has his finger on the pulse of authentic and engagement. Really? Yuh. Stick to search, guys. Maybe if they stuck a few more “Great!”s in…?

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:35:00 +0000

The use of exclamation points was borderline obnoxious, borderline saccharine — and it was the first thing that I noticed. It didn’t sound anything like coming from Larry Page, based on every other time I’ve heard him answer questions. Totally written by PR.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:59:00 +0000

comment is just critical to know but this commend is my decision change this reason commending is easy now the article read. I can challenge anyone except it.

By: Today’s Recommended Reads « Google Monitor

Today’s Recommended Reads « Google Monitor — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:28:59 +0000

[...] On Larry Page’s Letter – Super Amazing Great Tremendous! [...]