<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Framework for &#8220;Consumer Data Privacy&#8221; And My &#8220;Data Bill of Rights&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/02/obamas-framework-for-consumer-data-privacy-and-my-data-bill-of-rights.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/02/obamas-framework-for-consumer-data-privacy-and-my-data-bill-of-rights.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-framework-for-consumer-data-privacy-and-my-data-bill-of-rights</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Camp</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/02/obamas-framework-for-consumer-data-privacy-and-my-data-bill-of-rights.php#comment-29052</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6036#comment-29052</guid>
		<description>Data Rights - it&#039;d be great to see a new standard where privacy policies go down a full check list of all these data rights. and allow people to pay for the ability to enable certain non-standard rights. 
I  love the idea of Data Value. I&#039;ve been wanting something like this for a long, long time. The &#039;privacy is dead&#039; meme will get a run for it&#039;s money once a framework is in place that allows people to put a dollar value on their privacy/data. 
With the right data/value frameworks in place I think there&#039;s an opportunity for consumers to become their own attention brokers - dealing directly with ad sellers for access to that consumers &#039;ad space&#039; in any environment, on any medium. Cutting out some/all of the existing middlemen and capturing more of that value for themselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data Rights &#8211; it&#8217;d be great to see a new standard where privacy policies go down a full check list of all these data rights. and allow people to pay for the ability to enable certain non-standard rights.<br />
I  love the idea of Data Value. I&#8217;ve been wanting something like this for a long, long time. The &#8216;privacy is dead&#8217; meme will get a run for it&#8217;s money once a framework is in place that allows people to put a dollar value on their privacy/data. <br />
With the right data/value frameworks in place I think there&#8217;s an opportunity for consumers to become their own attention brokers &#8211; dealing directly with ad sellers for access to that consumers &#8216;ad space&#8217; in any environment, on any medium. Cutting out some/all of the existing middlemen and capturing more of that value for themselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/02/obamas-framework-for-consumer-data-privacy-and-my-data-bill-of-rights.php#comment-28807</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=6036#comment-28807</guid>
		<description>Great post. I think the argument over our data (and how it&#039;s used) will (or should) be looked at using the Penumbra theory. The theory seems to come into play most during controversial disputes (i.e: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut &amp; http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/penumbra).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I think the argument over our data (and how it&#8217;s used) will (or should) be looked at using the Penumbra theory. The theory seems to come into play most during controversial disputes (i.e: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut</a> &amp; <a href="http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/penumbra" rel="nofollow">http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/penumbra</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
