<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Statement on Google+ Integration with Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#124; Ajmeria Magic Development Home Practice</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-29910</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#124; Ajmeria Magic Development Home Practice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-29910</guid>
		<description>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Google Erred Big Time With Search Plus Your World?</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26887</link>
		<dc:creator>Has Google Erred Big Time With Search Plus Your World?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26887</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter said that it was concerned and the change is bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter said that it was concerned and the change is bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking for the &#8216;plus&#8217; in Google+ &#171; stuffasiseeit</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26802</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking for the &#8216;plus&#8217; in Google+ &#171; stuffasiseeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26802</guid>
		<description>[...] In short, sometime early in Q2 2012, it’s going to pass Twitter.  I’d say that equates to some pretty serious credibility, not to mention critical mass.  Twitter, understandably, is somewhat concerned about this and with the launch of Search plus Your World has had the perfect opportunity to make its concerns public. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In short, sometime early in Q2 2012, it’s going to pass Twitter.  I’d say that equates to some pretty serious credibility, not to mention critical mass.  Twitter, understandably, is somewhat concerned about this and with the launch of Search plus Your World has had the perfect opportunity to make its concerns public. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#171; &#171;</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26801</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#171; &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26801</guid>
		<description>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viralsocialmarketing.com &#187; Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26799</link>
		<dc:creator>viralsocialmarketing.com &#187; Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26799</guid>
		<description>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#124; Internet Business Social Media</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26797</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#124; Internet Business Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26797</guid>
		<description>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#171; Marketing &#171; Business Tactics</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26794</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google+ is an Inevitable Part of Your Content Marketing Strategy &#171; Marketing &#171; Business Tactics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26794</guid>
		<description>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued a statement decrying the preferential treatment for Google+ results over Twitter. Google responded by revealing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google+ included in search &#171; ooarev</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26411</link>
		<dc:creator>Google+ included in search &#171; ooarev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26411</guid>
		<description>[...] updates results for its social network, John Battelle&#8217;s Search Blog: http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search... Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.    Categories: News, Search, Social networks        [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] updates results for its social network, John Battelle&#8217;s Search Blog: <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search" rel="nofollow">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search</a>&#8230; Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.    Categories: News, Search, Social networks        [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter, Media Gouge Google Over New Social Search &#187; Techno Capital</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26361</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter, Media Gouge Google Over New Social Search &#187; Techno Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26361</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter General Counsel and former Googler Alexander Macgillvray  tweeted that the play is a &#8220;bad day for the Internet.&#8221; The microblog went on the attack with the statement, via John Battelle: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter General Counsel and former Googler Alexander Macgillvray  tweeted that the play is a &#8220;bad day for the Internet.&#8221; The microblog went on the attack with the statement, via John Battelle: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/twitter-statement-on-google-integration-with-google-search.php#comment-26299</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5784#comment-26299</guid>
		<description>Afraid you make not big much sense, seo copywriter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afraid you make not big much sense, seo copywriter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
