<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet Big Five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-internet-big-five</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Patterson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-32475</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-32475</guid>
		<description>I agree with Allen Taylor that the crucial competitive advantage Google has over the other big 4 companies is the openness of their ecosystem and development platforms. I thought that the lesson had already been learned from the first implosion of Apple computers vis a vis the PC and Microsoft&#039;s OS, that relatively closed platforms have a limited shelf life. The business that is the most porous to &quot;crowd&quot; sourcing its development ideas, will always prevail.

Yes, Apple have had a spectacular renaissance built on the back of game changing hardware devices, which in turn have lead to new markets for application development. However that emphasis on new hardware, is ultimately self limiting, as devices will either merge utilities, or we will reach saturation point on the number of devices we can physically carry. Either way, having already covered most bases, there is probably a limit to the amount of hardware Apple can continue to bring to market, that we can consume or even wish to master technically.

Having said all of this, I suspect the big 5 corporations are already too narrowly focused on information and data as stand alone commodities. Discuss :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Allen Taylor that the crucial competitive advantage Google has over the other big 4 companies is the openness of their ecosystem and development platforms. I thought that the lesson had already been learned from the first implosion of Apple computers vis a vis the PC and Microsoft&#8217;s OS, that relatively closed platforms have a limited shelf life. The business that is the most porous to &#8220;crowd&#8221; sourcing its development ideas, will always prevail.</p>
<p>Yes, Apple have had a spectacular renaissance built on the back of game changing hardware devices, which in turn have lead to new markets for application development. However that emphasis on new hardware, is ultimately self limiting, as devices will either merge utilities, or we will reach saturation point on the number of devices we can physically carry. Either way, having already covered most bases, there is probably a limit to the amount of hardware Apple can continue to bring to market, that we can consume or even wish to master technically.</p>
<p>Having said all of this, I suspect the big 5 corporations are already too narrowly focused on information and data as stand alone commodities. Discuss <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nexus 7 and The Cloud Commit Conundrum: Google Wins (For Now) &#124;</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-30194</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nexus 7 and The Cloud Commit Conundrum: Google Wins (For Now) &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-30194</guid>
		<description>[...] valuable: a hard-wired digital portal to our hearts, minds, and wallets. As I&#8217;ve written elsewhere, there are five major companies deeply engaged in this play &#8211; Amazon, Google, Facebook, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] valuable: a hard-wired digital portal to our hearts, minds, and wallets. As I&#8217;ve written elsewhere, there are five major companies deeply engaged in this play &#8211; Amazon, Google, Facebook, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nexus 7 and The Cloud Commit Conundrum: Google Wins (For Now) &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-30180</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nexus 7 and The Cloud Commit Conundrum: Google Wins (For Now) &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-30180</guid>
		<description>[...] valuable: a hard-wired digital portal to our hearts, minds, and wallets. As I&#8217;ve written elsewhere, there are five major companies deeply engaged in this play &#8211; Amazon, Google, Facebook, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] valuable: a hard-wired digital portal to our hearts, minds, and wallets. As I&#8217;ve written elsewhere, there are five major companies deeply engaged in this play &#8211; Amazon, Google, Facebook, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Internet Big Five: Up $272 Billion in Six Months &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-29612</link>
		<dc:creator>The Internet Big Five: Up $272 Billion in Six Months &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-29612</guid>
		<description>[...] December I posted on &#8220;The Internet Big Five,&#8221; noting their relative strengths and the market cap of each. Since that time, the Five have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December I posted on &#8220;The Internet Big Five,&#8221; noting their relative strengths and the market cap of each. Since that time, the Five have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaron Lanier: Something Doesn&#8217;t Smell Right &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-29525</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaron Lanier: Something Doesn&#8217;t Smell Right &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-29525</guid>
		<description>[...] shift. I&#8217;m also fascinated by the organizations attempting to leverage that data, from the Internet Big Five to the startups and behind the scenes players (Palantir, IBM, governments, financial institutions, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shift. I&#8217;m also fascinated by the organizations attempting to leverage that data, from the Internet Big Five to the startups and behind the scenes players (Palantir, IBM, governments, financial institutions, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-28901</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-28901</guid>
		<description>Good point, Mark. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Mark. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kelly Murphy</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-28893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kelly Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-28893</guid>
		<description>This is a great analysis but I&#039;m thinking it should include China&#039;s Tencent with its market cap of $358B. Baidu would not make the top 5, but is significant at $46B. The companies on the list indeed have broad international presence but I would think the Chinese are thinking hard about how to do that too. A natural partner could be Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great analysis but I&#8217;m thinking it should include China&#8217;s Tencent with its market cap of $358B. Baidu would not make the top 5, but is significant at $46B. The companies on the list indeed have broad international presence but I would think the Chinese are thinking hard about how to do that too. A natural partner could be Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireburst</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-28872</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireburst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-28872</guid>
		<description>hmm, Microsoft and Google are tearing each other to peaces. One of them or both of them is going to go. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, Microsoft and Google are tearing each other to peaces. One of them or both of them is going to go. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Hath Google Forsaken Us? A Meditation. &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-28853</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Hath Google Forsaken Us? A Meditation. &#124; John Battelle&#039;s Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-28853</guid>
		<description>[...] its customers, it believes it will be seen as the most open and accommodative player amongst the Internet Big Five. It will compete on policy and data use, and it believes it will win on those points. It will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its customers, it believes it will be seen as the most open and accommodative player amongst the Internet Big Five. It will compete on policy and data use, and it believes it will win on those points. It will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap oakley sunglasses</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2011/12/the-internet-big-five.php#comment-28350</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap oakley sunglasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/?p=5660#comment-28350</guid>
		<description>TYCLLOHHZYTQLKX
Replica Oakley Sunglasses are Awesome and Well-liked by the Young
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TYCLLOHHZYTQLKX<br />
Replica Oakley Sunglasses are Awesome and Well-liked by the Young</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
