<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Proof, but Another Lead: WikiLeaks&apos; Latest Includes Google/China Tip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TektonikShift</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>TektonikShift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nick Winbanks, &lt;br /&gt;
Just because other news organizations succumb to &quot;link bait&quot; temptations does not make it right.  &lt;br /&gt;
At best, it misinforming us (not what news should do), at worst its deceitful for the sake of page views. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We should demand better of all them. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Tek&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Winbanks, <br />
Just because other news organizations succumb to &#8220;link bait&#8221; temptations does not make it right.  <br />
At best, it misinforming us (not what news should do), at worst its deceitful for the sake of page views. </p>
<p>We should demand better of all them. </p>
<p>-Tek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikileaks news</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>wikileaks news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott Shane reported from Washington, and Andrew W. Lehren from New York. Reporting was contributed by Jo Becker, C. J. Chivers and James Glanz from New York; Eric Lichtblau, Michael R. Gordon, David E. Sanger, Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt and Ginger Thompson from Washington; and Jane Perlez from Islamabad, Pakistan. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Shane reported from Washington, and Andrew W. Lehren from New York. Reporting was contributed by Jo Becker, C. J. Chivers and James Glanz from New York; Eric Lichtblau, Michael R. Gordon, David E. Sanger, Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt and Ginger Thompson from Washington; and Jane Perlez from Islamabad, Pakistan. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Winbanks</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Winbanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair to Techcrunch, The Guardian are running with this line in one of their stories on the topic - &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;How the hacker attacks which forced Google to quit China in January were orchestrated by a senior member of the Politburo who typed his own name into the global version of the search engine and found articles criticising him personally.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2dsqveh&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2dsqveh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to Techcrunch, The Guardian are running with this line in one of their stories on the topic &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;How the hacker attacks which forced Google to quit China in January were orchestrated by a senior member of the Politburo who typed his own name into the global version of the search engine and found articles criticising him personally.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2dsqveh" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2dsqveh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhien</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>rhien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s good news, John. So our State Department to be more alert to problems that could threaten our government through the U.S. government computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good news, John. So our State Department to be more alert to problems that could threaten our government through the U.S. government computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TektonikShift</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>TektonikShift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As usual, another link bait headline by TechCrunch. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
As usual, another link bait headline by TechCrunch. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nocera</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nocera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/11/not_proof_but_another_lead_wikileaks_latest_includes_googlechina_tip.php#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A good catch and call out, John.  What I&#039;ve read today generally makes me feel proud of the job our State Department field staff has done over many years to provide objective, helpful insights up the chain of command. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good catch and call out, John.  What I&#8217;ve read today generally makes me feel proud of the job our State Department field staff has done over many years to provide objective, helpful insights up the chain of command. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
