<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Takes One More Step Away From China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;is not google accepting in its blog post that they were breaking the local chinese laws until now?&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Frankly speaking, you falls into the pattern of &quot;Chinese government&#039;s payed commenters&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a native Chinese, I want to ask which law did google break? What i read is Chinese government invent the story that google break law, on the not-reachable bookshelf.&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of Google&#039;s withdraw, Baidu are further mixing ad content with normal search result, that&#039;s what happens here. Even the pro government papers begins to complain this trend. Sad stories for normal Chinese. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is not google accepting in its blog post that they were breaking the local chinese laws until now?<br />
&#8220;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Frankly speaking, you falls into the pattern of &#8220;Chinese government&#8217;s payed commenters&#8221;.</p>
<p>As a native Chinese, I want to ask which law did google break? What i read is Chinese government invent the story that google break law, on the not-reachable bookshelf.<br />
As a result of Google&#8217;s withdraw, Baidu are further mixing ad content with normal search result, that&#8217;s what happens here. Even the pro government papers begins to complain this trend. Sad stories for normal Chinese. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/06/google_takes_one_more_step_away_from_china.php#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;is not google accepting in its blog post that they were breaking the local chinese laws until now?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is not google accepting in its blog post that they were breaking the local chinese laws until now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
