<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Me Interview Arianna Huffington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=help_me_interview_arianna_huffington</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(1) Where will the innovation in &#039;online content monetization&#039; (OCM) come from?&lt;br /&gt;
AOL? HuffPost? TechCrunch/GigaOm/TPM/Politico? NYT? WSJ? Or somebody not yet on the screen.&lt;br /&gt;
(2) What is the biggest revenue stream currently, and what the most underrated one, in OCM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(3) How does she justify do pivot HuffPost several times from Politics/and blogs, to boobs, celebrities, sensationalism and aggregation. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not to mention that it became a mainstream product, driven by getting more and more eyeballs by focusing on &quot;what gets us more eyeballs?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of saying, how do we optimise revenue for the current product?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) Where will the innovation in &#8216;online content monetization&#8217; (OCM) come from?<br />
AOL? HuffPost? TechCrunch/GigaOm/TPM/Politico? NYT? WSJ? Or somebody not yet on the screen.<br />
(2) What is the biggest revenue stream currently, and what the most underrated one, in OCM.</p>
<p>(3) How does she justify do pivot HuffPost several times from Politics/and blogs, to boobs, celebrities, sensationalism and aggregation. </p>
<p>Not to mention that it became a mainstream product, driven by getting more and more eyeballs by focusing on &#8220;what gets us more eyeballs?&#8221;</p>
<p>Instead of saying, how do we optimise revenue for the current product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Goetz</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Goetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How does HP think about managing the costs of reporting. Reporting is expensive, yet it is one of the differentiators of journalism? Is old world reporting dead?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does HP think about managing the costs of reporting. Reporting is expensive, yet it is one of the differentiators of journalism? Is old world reporting dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/help_me_interview_arianna_huffington.php#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ask her why she has allowed her idea-driven and serious platform to be so completely overwhelmed by sensationalistic, trivial, tabloid, petty, silliness. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know the answer is &#039;pageviews&#039; but how can she justify all the false shock and outrage and celebrity nothingness that take up about 50% of the site space. There is great value in both the original ideas and aggregation they do, but it&#039;s watered down with complete horseshit in a very sad way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As John Stewart once said in a slightly different context, &#039;you&#039;re hurting us&#039;. Why? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask her why she has allowed her idea-driven and serious platform to be so completely overwhelmed by sensationalistic, trivial, tabloid, petty, silliness. </p>
<p>I know the answer is &#8216;pageviews&#8217; but how can she justify all the false shock and outrage and celebrity nothingness that take up about 50% of the site space. There is great value in both the original ideas and aggregation they do, but it&#8217;s watered down with complete horseshit in a very sad way.</p>
<p>As John Stewart once said in a slightly different context, &#8216;you&#8217;re hurting us&#8217;. Why? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
