<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 68% of 85% is really 57.8%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=68_of_85_is_really_578</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Catalyst</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-26007</link>
		<dc:creator>The Catalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-26007</guid>
		<description>i submited my adsense application in 2008 for the very first time and guess what? they disapproved it. however i created a new blog for technology, mobile phones, computers etc. etc and resubmitted it. google approved it within 3 days! i was amazed. but still my blog is in review so that i see no google ads in my blog. yet i am happy.

but i just can’t understand what to blog about in my blog anymore. i appreciate if somebody with experience give me some adsense advice… :) :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i submited my adsense application in 2008 for the very first time and guess what? they disapproved it. however i created a new blog for technology, mobile phones, computers etc. etc and resubmitted it. google approved it within 3 days! i was amazed. but still my blog is in review so that i see no google ads in my blog. yet i am happy.</p>
<p>but i just can’t understand what to blog about in my blog anymore. i appreciate if somebody with experience give me some adsense advice… <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbert Mayer-Wittmann</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbert Mayer-Wittmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Geoff + @Andy: It might be interesting to go through the mental exercise of: &quot;How could we tell the difference between &lt;i&gt;high quality&lt;/i&gt; versus a &lt;i&gt;preferred partner&lt;/i&gt;?&quot; For example: I think it&#039;s a no-brainer that YouTube videos show up near the top of Google SERPs because of the &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;extremely&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; close relationship between Google + YouTube (the other day, I actually referred to it as GooTube ;)....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Geoff + @Andy: It might be interesting to go through the mental exercise of: &#8220;How could we tell the difference between <i>high quality</i> versus a <i>preferred partner</i>?&#8221; For example: I think it&#8217;s a no-brainer that YouTube videos show up near the top of Google SERPs because of the <b><i>extremely</i></b> close relationship between Google + YouTube (the other day, I actually referred to it as GooTube <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Jackson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 08:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Andy Are you saying there is likely another factor similar to quality score or there should be a factor such as this included?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either way, it would certainly make sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy Are you saying there is likely another factor similar to quality score or there should be a factor such as this included?</p>
<p>Either way, it would certainly make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 04:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You ae aboslutely right. 57.5% doent seem lucrative number.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice math done here. Good analitical skill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ae aboslutely right. 57.5% doent seem lucrative number.</p>
<p>Nice math done here. Good analitical skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There must be another factor in there similar to a quality score.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On a low quality site both Google and the publisher earn less for the same ad click, but it would keep advertisers happier as the chance of conversion would be different.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be another factor in there similar to a quality score.</p>
<p>On a low quality site both Google and the publisher earn less for the same ad click, but it would keep advertisers happier as the chance of conversion would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Krzych</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Krzych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 20:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@John: interesting information. Google&#039;s rev. share is still below industry standard which is 70-75% for publishers. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We just launched commission-free self service advertising network: AdTaily.com. however it is a bit different product than AdSense, because it enables publishers sell ads directly to visitors taking 100%.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: interesting information. Google&#8217;s rev. share is still below industry standard which is 70-75% for publishers. </p>
<p>We just launched commission-free self service advertising network: AdTaily.com. however it is a bit different product than AdSense, because it enables publishers sell ads directly to visitors taking 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have piqued my curiosity but in the final analysis my AdSense revenue won&#039;t be affected one way or the other regardless of who is right or what percentage is bestowed upon me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what did the Italians do for me that my silence on the matter had not already done to begin with?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a publisher if I don&#039;t like a network I can always leave it -- and I have abandoned many affiliate and advertising networks through the years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, all that matters is how much money you put into my account.  How you arrive at that number doesn&#039;t really matter to me if you didn&#039;t recruit me into your network on the basis of percentages in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have piqued my curiosity but in the final analysis my AdSense revenue won&#8217;t be affected one way or the other regardless of who is right or what percentage is bestowed upon me.</p>
<p>So what did the Italians do for me that my silence on the matter had not already done to begin with?</p>
<p>As a publisher if I don&#8217;t like a network I can always leave it &#8212; and I have abandoned many affiliate and advertising networks through the years.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, all that matters is how much money you put into my account.  How you arrive at that number doesn&#8217;t really matter to me if you didn&#8217;t recruit me into your network on the basis of percentages in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mmm are you sure the 15% share is not bundled into the Google revenue share (the 32%) in the AdSense online program ? I really don&#039;t think there&#039;s an extra 15% on top.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm are you sure the 15% share is not bundled into the Google revenue share (the 32%) in the AdSense online program ? I really don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s an extra 15% on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/68_of_85_is_really_578.php#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the standard is 80% of 85%, thus the 68% referenced in the AdSense blog post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the standard is 80% of 85%, thus the 68% referenced in the AdSense blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
