<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bing</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sekar</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>sekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bing is so cluttered, we built an easy to use Bing using Bing API. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stringy.com/bing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.stringy.com/bing.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is so cluttered, we built an easy to use Bing using Bing API. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.stringy.com/bing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stringy.com/bing.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>wigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While I am not a Microsoftie, I am neither a Googler.  Both companies display arrogance towards the consumer, the former company with indifference to users&#039; plight with software bugs and patches, the latter with the scope of their offerings.  They both like to talk out of both sides of their mouth. The difference, of course, is that one company has earned the scorn of techies, while the other has become the new darling of the tech world. But beneath that nerdy exterior lies just another evil company.  Which is ironically, the reason I welcome improved search.  A monopoly is a monopoly, whether Windows or Office or Google Search and YouTube and search ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am not a Microsoftie, I am neither a Googler.  Both companies display arrogance towards the consumer, the former company with indifference to users&#8217; plight with software bugs and patches, the latter with the scope of their offerings.  They both like to talk out of both sides of their mouth. The difference, of course, is that one company has earned the scorn of techies, while the other has become the new darling of the tech world. But beneath that nerdy exterior lies just another evil company.  Which is ironically, the reason I welcome improved search.  A monopoly is a monopoly, whether Windows or Office or Google Search and YouTube and search ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reecq</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>reecq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it will be cool to have this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geekpolice.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.geekpolice.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will be cool to have this.</p>
<p>
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
<a href="http://www.geekpolice.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekpolice.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4260</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4260</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bing is a great thing to be tried. If this search promises different perspective of search engine, them it really worth a try. The good thing on the existence of a new market provider in search engine, is the increase of the competitiveness of Search Engine in the industry. As long as fair competition is observe, these giant engines (Google,Yahoo,Bing) will strive to be more competitive to battle search engine supremacy. And the beneficiaries? -the users. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is a great thing to be tried. If this search promises different perspective of search engine, them it really worth a try. The good thing on the existence of a new market provider in search engine, is the increase of the competitiveness of Search Engine in the industry. As long as fair competition is observe, these giant engines (Google,Yahoo,Bing) will strive to be more competitive to battle search engine supremacy. And the beneficiaries? -the users. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe this marketing campaign will shake up the search engine market metrics, which are so obsolete as to be useless now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea that Google controls 65-75% of the search market is completely ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this marketing campaign will shake up the search engine market metrics, which are so obsolete as to be useless now.</p>
<p>The idea that Google controls 65-75% of the search market is completely ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/05/bing.php#comment-4258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Instead, they&#039;ll focus on planting the idea that today&#039;s search engines don&#039;t work as well as consumers previously thought by asking them whether search (aka Google) really solves their problems&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whether or not Bing really solves customers&#039; problems, either, is secondary to the fact that this pitch is completely correct.  Search engines really don&#039;t work as well as we think, and don&#039;t really go a long way in helping us solve our problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest challenge is to get users to realize that they&#039;ve gradually lowered their expectations over the years, and have been conditioned by the existing search engines to only ask a certain type of question, and only ask it in a certain way.  Users have adapted themselves to existing search engines, more than search engines have adapted to users, and no longer ask the more difficult questions that they used to, before they became familiar with the current state of search.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, users still have those difficult questions.  They just subconsciously know to avoid trying to answer them using today&#039;s &quot;90% solved&quot; ;-) search engines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So no matter if Bing succeeds or fails, I welcome their effort to change perceptions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Instead, they&#8217;ll focus on planting the idea that today&#8217;s search engines don&#8217;t work as well as consumers previously thought by asking them whether search (aka Google) really solves their problems</i></p>
<p>Whether or not Bing really solves customers&#8217; problems, either, is secondary to the fact that this pitch is completely correct.  Search engines really don&#8217;t work as well as we think, and don&#8217;t really go a long way in helping us solve our problems.</p>
<p>The biggest challenge is to get users to realize that they&#8217;ve gradually lowered their expectations over the years, and have been conditioned by the existing search engines to only ask a certain type of question, and only ask it in a certain way.  Users have adapted themselves to existing search engines, more than search engines have adapted to users, and no longer ask the more difficult questions that they used to, before they became familiar with the current state of search.  </p>
<p>Oh, users still have those difficult questions.  They just subconsciously know to avoid trying to answer them using today&#8217;s &#8220;90% solved&#8221; <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  search engines.</p>
<p>So no matter if Bing succeeds or fails, I welcome their effort to change perceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
