<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Shows &quot;What&apos;s On Its Mind&quot; &#8211; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZuDfunck</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>ZuDfunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Help me not to see Twitter as the death knell to Blogging!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help me not to see Twitter as the death knell to Blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steen Seo Öhman</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4819</link>
		<dc:creator>Steen Seo Öhman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is, as far as I see it, more informal than Facebook. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s easy to get a lot of followers on Twitter and this is increasing the number of post and interactions with other people. Twitter could therefore show to be much better suited for marketing, as the viral effects are much stronger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is, as far as I see it, more informal than Facebook. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to get a lot of followers on Twitter and this is increasing the number of post and interactions with other people. Twitter could therefore show to be much better suited for marketing, as the viral effects are much stronger. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil Hatt</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter proved certain elements are important: thoughts are dime a dozen to (interesting) actions, and that technology allowed faster updates; they also went into mobile.  I&#039;m surprised that people criticise Facebook for taking clues.  I doubt they&#039;ll imitate other essential features, like the openness and the simplicity of the service — so differentiation doesn&#039;t seem too much of an issue. But you can&#039;t blame Facebook for trying: 200 millions for what was a disfunctionnal services weeks ago that they not copied but inspired, two-way applications; they did their due-diligence so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter proved certain elements are important: thoughts are dime a dozen to (interesting) actions, and that technology allowed faster updates; they also went into mobile.  I&#8217;m surprised that people criticise Facebook for taking clues.  I doubt they&#8217;ll imitate other essential features, like the openness and the simplicity of the service — so differentiation doesn&#8217;t seem too much of an issue. But you can&#8217;t blame Facebook for trying: 200 millions for what was a disfunctionnal services weeks ago that they not copied but inspired, two-way applications; they did their due-diligence so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackerMo</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackerMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is the flavor of the week... the real question is, what will Google be looking at next week?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is the flavor of the week&#8230; the real question is, what will Google be looking at next week?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M.</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4816</link>
		<dc:creator>John M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What ought to be on Twitter&#039;s mind is &#039;real people&#039;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Facebook is going to end up being a much better platform for real time search because the data is going to be coming from real people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ought to be on Twitter&#8217;s mind is &#8216;real people&#8217;. </p>
<p>Facebook is going to end up being a much better platform for real time search because the data is going to be coming from real people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick OMalley</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4815</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick OMalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some may have come from Twitter, but some is also obvious.  What Twitter and Facebook both need is a way for me to see posts that people think are good (by vote, which is what the Facebook status &quot;Like&quot; function is probably for) and skip the boring ones if I don&#039;t have time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patrickomalley.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pat O&#039;Malley&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some may have come from Twitter, but some is also obvious.  What Twitter and Facebook both need is a way for me to see posts that people think are good (by vote, which is what the Facebook status &#8220;Like&#8221; function is probably for) and skip the boring ones if I don&#8217;t have time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patrickomalley.com" rel="nofollow">Pat O&#8217;Malley</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; be obsessed with the &lt;b&gt;Wisdom of the Language&lt;/b&gt; ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://gaggle.info/miscellaneous/articles/wisdom-of-the-language&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gaggle.info/miscellaneous/articles/wisdom-of-the-language&lt;/a&gt; ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Among the 4 companies you mention (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter), the only one paying a &lt;i&gt;significant&lt;/i&gt; amount of attention to the Wisdom of the Language is Google: The &lt;b&gt;Chrome&lt;/b&gt; browser is designed to track &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of the websites that people type into the browsers URL bar (and knowing Google&#039;s &lt;b&gt;huge&lt;/b&gt; interest in making &lt;b&gt;tons&lt;/b&gt; of money from advertising it probably won&#039;t be long before Google starts pushing ads into Chome&#039;s URL / Location / Navigation bar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter <b><i>should</i></b> be obsessed with the <b>Wisdom of the Language</b> ( <a href="http://gaggle.info/miscellaneous/articles/wisdom-of-the-language" rel="nofollow">http://gaggle.info/miscellaneous/articles/wisdom-of-the-language</a> ).</p>
<p>Among the 4 companies you mention (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter), the only one paying a <i>significant</i> amount of attention to the Wisdom of the Language is Google: The <b>Chrome</b> browser is designed to track <i>all</i> of the websites that people type into the browsers URL bar (and knowing Google&#8217;s <b>huge</b> interest in making <b>tons</b> of money from advertising it probably won&#8217;t be long before Google starts pushing ads into Chome&#8217;s URL / Location / Navigation bar).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante Monteverde</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4813</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante Monteverde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Microsoft wants to compete they should just buy Facebook now while it&#039;s relatively inexpensive. Meanwhile Twitter should sell to Google now before a site like Facebook makes them absolute.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft wants to compete they should just buy Facebook now while it&#8217;s relatively inexpensive. Meanwhile Twitter should sell to Google now before a site like Facebook makes them absolute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Simmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/03/facebook_shows_whats_on_its_mind_-_twitter.php#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The smart move would be to obsess itself with Microsoft and square the circle...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smart move would be to obsess itself with Microsoft and square the circle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
