Comments on: Notable – Varney on Google

By: curtis

curtis — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:03:38 +0000

For once, I bet Ballmer wasn’t offended by that slam on MSFT…….when the big G gets slammed harder….

By: Matthieu Catillon

Matthieu Catillon — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:39:02 +0000

http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=59970333419&h=146f5&u=w49Py

"According to the visitor/visits data published by Compete and Quantcast, Google commands no more than a 40% market share."

"50% of Google's traffic is produced by only 10% of the people who use Google"

How do you guys feel about that?
Is the 40% figure accurate?

By: hekimboard

hekimboard — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:23:18 +0000

Thanks Artı.Great idea.

By: Artı

Artı — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:39:23 +0000

A May 2008 research report by Merrill Lynch & Co. said Google and Salesforce.com are “leveraged to benefit from cloud computing because their core service delivery is based on the Internet.” They were among 10 companies, including Amazon.com, Sun Microsystems Inc. and Microsoft, that were positioned to capitalize on the shift to Internet-based software. Still, Google’s “revenues from these services are currently less than 1 percent of total revenues,” the report said.

Varney said last June she was “deeply troubled” by Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick Inc., a maker of software for online advertising, and its proposed advertising alliance with Yahoo! Inc.

The DoubleClick purchase was cleared by the Federal Trade Commission in 2007. In November, the Justice Department blocked Google’s proposal to share online advertising with Yahoo by threatening to file a lawsuit challenging the joint venture. Google and Yahoo canceled the deal.

By: Search Engine Optimization Service

Search Engine Optimization Service — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:31:10 +0000

Hey,

It’s long past time to repeal anti-trust laws. There’s no way to have a monopoly unless there is government enforcement and there is nothing what can be seen as any government-enforced policy on Google.

By: nmw

nmw — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:36 +0000

Fascinating!

;D nmw

By: artistofideas

artistofideas — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:26:01 +0000

Excuse this language (rhetorically important): Varney is an idiot.

MSFT was convicted ... for good reason.

The order to break MSFT up ... was justified by the findings of the trial.

The Bush Admin DOJ (which loves torture and hated Google,too) ... let MSFT off the hook.

Why does "last century" MSFT matter? ... Because it continues to profit -- and wield influence -- from its (convicted) "criminal" behavior last century.

Google -- unlike MSFT -- did not rise by strong-arming (coercing) deals (as was proven in the antitrust case.

(enough for now:) Cheers.

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:48:14 +0000

Wonder if concerns about Ms. Varney’s take on GOOG are the reason Eric Schmidt appears to have become a permanent fixture in Washington?

By: Rich

Rich — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:59:30 +0000

Ugh. It’s long past time to repeal anti-trust laws. There’s no way to have a monopoly unless there is government enforcement and I don’t see any government-enforced Googleopoly.