<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lenoir, North Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lenoir_north_carolina</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7312</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not only that, but in the &quot;title&quot; field of the linked-to HTML document the name of the county &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; seems to be misspelled.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess we live in an era of &quot;did you mean?&quot;...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but in the &#8220;title&#8221; field of the linked-to HTML document the name of the county <i>also</i> seems to be misspelled.</p>
<p>I guess we live in an era of &#8220;did you mean?&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Lail</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Lail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7311</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoops, the link for Lenoir goes to the county of Lenoir, but the data center is in the city of Lenoir.  North Carolina, being the way it is, the two aren&#039;t remotely in the same area. The data center is the western North Carolina town of Lenoir while Lenoir County is in the eastern part of the state.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, the link for Lenoir goes to the county of Lenoir, but the data center is in the city of Lenoir.  North Carolina, being the way it is, the two aren&#8217;t remotely in the same area. The data center is the western North Carolina town of Lenoir while Lenoir County is in the eastern part of the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7310</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding your reference to Back to the Future - you mean Hill Valley, California? Well, that set burned down at Universal Studios on June 1st - which is a shame.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your reference to Back to the Future &#8211; you mean Hill Valley, California? Well, that set burned down at Universal Studios on June 1st &#8211; which is a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;getting English grammar -- I guess:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;is indeed a wonderful addition&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;should read&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;were &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; indeed a wonderful addition&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry -- my fingers don&#039;t always &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;work&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; the way they&#039;re &lt;i&gt;supposed&lt;/i&gt; to!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;;D nmw&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>getting English grammar &#8212; I guess:</p>
<p>&#8220;is indeed a wonderful addition&#8221;</p>
<p>should read</p>
<p>&#8220;were <i>not</i> indeed a wonderful addition&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry &#8212; my fingers don&#8217;t always <b><i>work</i></b> the way they&#8217;re <i>supposed</i> to!</p>
<p>;D nmw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mel,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would have &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; problem&lt;/b&gt; with John&#039;s story if this blog were about data centers, cheap power, cheap land, taxes, the economy or perhaps even Hollywood movies (or something like that).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now I would indeed be wrong to suggest that anything John might find amusing or interesting or maybe just touches his heart with a certain sentimental color is indeed a wonderful addition to the SearchBlog (which, indeed, is &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; &quot;battellemedia.com&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe I just don&#039;t &quot;understand it&quot; -- but I do admit that John&#039;s added remark comparing Google&#039;s influence to the &quot;planned&quot; towns/cities created industrial magnates in centuries past did &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;alot&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; to &quot;explain&quot; his motivation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In that context, it will indeed be interesting (for our children?) to see what Google&#039;s &quot;legacy&quot; is -- will it simply be to &lt;b&gt;get&lt;/b&gt; cheap land, &lt;b&gt;get&lt;/b&gt; cheap labor, &lt;b&gt;get&lt;/b&gt; cheap power -- &lt;i&gt;get, get, get&lt;/i&gt;?!?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The school I attended as a child had the following words written in big letters near the entrance: &quot;With all thy getting, get understanding&quot;. Every morning I would read those words, and think about their meaning. I guess they were chosen in the context of giving meaning to why education is important.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since then I have come to value and cherish those words -- and I have also thought of them many times again, and now I notice I have actually transported them into new contexts (such as &quot;getting the political regime you deserve&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I wonder whether perhaps my initial &quot;pushing back&quot; on this topic has somehow &lt;i&gt;added&lt;/i&gt; to the conversation instead of stamping it out -- at least I &lt;b&gt;hope&lt;/b&gt; that is the case.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, please accept my apologies if I have taken the topic &quot;off track&quot; (no pun intended ;)....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel,</p>
<p>I would have <b><i>no</i> problem</b> with John&#8217;s story if this blog were about data centers, cheap power, cheap land, taxes, the economy or perhaps even Hollywood movies (or something like that).</p>
<p>Now I would indeed be wrong to suggest that anything John might find amusing or interesting or maybe just touches his heart with a certain sentimental color is indeed a wonderful addition to the SearchBlog (which, indeed, is <i>actually</i> &#8220;battellemedia.com&#8221;).</p>
<p>Maybe I just don&#8217;t &#8220;understand it&#8221; &#8212; but I do admit that John&#8217;s added remark comparing Google&#8217;s influence to the &#8220;planned&#8221; towns/cities created industrial magnates in centuries past did <b><i>alot</i></b> to &#8220;explain&#8221; his motivation.</p>
<p>In that context, it will indeed be interesting (for our children?) to see what Google&#8217;s &#8220;legacy&#8221; is &#8212; will it simply be to <b>get</b> cheap land, <b>get</b> cheap labor, <b>get</b> cheap power &#8212; <i>get, get, get</i>?!?</p>
<p>The school I attended as a child had the following words written in big letters near the entrance: &#8220;With all thy getting, get understanding&#8221;. Every morning I would read those words, and think about their meaning. I guess they were chosen in the context of giving meaning to why education is important.</p>
<p>Since then I have come to value and cherish those words &#8212; and I have also thought of them many times again, and now I notice I have actually transported them into new contexts (such as &#8220;getting the political regime you deserve&#8221;).</p>
<p>So I wonder whether perhaps my initial &#8220;pushing back&#8221; on this topic has somehow <i>added</i> to the conversation instead of stamping it out &#8212; at least I <b>hope</b> that is the case.</p>
<p>Otherwise, please accept my apologies if I have taken the topic &#8220;off track&#8221; (no pun intended <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  nmw needs to put the coffee down for a day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think a few of these places are starting to see the same realization - In exchange for millions in tax breaks and incentives, they get increased demand on the local grid, and a couple hundred jobs for people to keep the servers running.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google wants cheap power, cheap land, and to not have to pay taxes.  That&#039;s all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  nmw needs to put the coffee down for a day.</p>
<p>I think a few of these places are starting to see the same realization &#8211; In exchange for millions in tax breaks and incentives, they get increased demand on the local grid, and a couple hundred jobs for people to keep the servers running.</p>
<p>Google wants cheap power, cheap land, and to not have to pay taxes.  That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing wrong with writing about a cool little town in NC that will store a piece of the data base of intentions. If you start worrying too much about your posts being specific or relevant, you won&#039;t post as much and we don&#039;t want that. As they might say in Lenoir, &quot;git er done!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with writing about a cool little town in NC that will store a piece of the data base of intentions. If you start worrying too much about your posts being specific or relevant, you won&#8217;t post as much and we don&#8217;t want that. As they might say in Lenoir, &#8220;git er done!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferruccio Fortini</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferruccio Fortini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why Lenoir (and nearby spots) for data centers? Doesn&#039;t take THAT much search savvy to find e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9015038&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9015038&lt;/a&gt; which explains &quot;North Carolina has something that may be attractive to data centers, and that&#039;s relatively low power cost: 4.5 cents to 5 cents per kWh, said Millar. In other areas of the U.S., electricity costs 6 cents per kWh, 11 cents per kWh or more. This particular area in Catawba also has a strong electric grid infrastructure, which was built to support furniture makers&quot; (and, as wikipedia explains, Lenoir&#039;s main employer used to be Broyhill, one of the US&#039;s largest furniture makers).&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, Google&#039;s The Dalles data center in Oregon, and Microsoft&#039;s, Yahoo&#039;s etc in Washington state, are there chiefly because of the cheap hydroelectric power afforded by the Columbia river (what&#039;s now Google&#039;s site at The Dalles used to house an aluminum smelter, an even more power-intensive plant than a furniture factory).&lt;br /&gt;
As e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1255876,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1255876,00.html&lt;/a&gt; explains, &quot;it&#039;s power, power, power in the site selection for data centers&quot; -- as these issues have been well publicized for years now, I&#039;m pretty disappointed to see a prestigious blogger and writer so unaware of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Lenoir (and nearby spots) for data centers? Doesn&#8217;t take THAT much search savvy to find e.g. <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9015038" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9015038</a> which explains &#8220;North Carolina has something that may be attractive to data centers, and that&#8217;s relatively low power cost: 4.5 cents to 5 cents per kWh, said Millar. In other areas of the U.S., electricity costs 6 cents per kWh, 11 cents per kWh or more. This particular area in Catawba also has a strong electric grid infrastructure, which was built to support furniture makers&#8221; (and, as wikipedia explains, Lenoir&#8217;s main employer used to be Broyhill, one of the US&#8217;s largest furniture makers).<br />
Similarly, Google&#8217;s The Dalles data center in Oregon, and Microsoft&#8217;s, Yahoo&#8217;s etc in Washington state, are there chiefly because of the cheap hydroelectric power afforded by the Columbia river (what&#8217;s now Google&#8217;s site at The Dalles used to house an aluminum smelter, an even more power-intensive plant than a furniture factory).<br />
As e.g. <a href="http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1255876,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1255876,00.html</a> explains, &#8220;it&#8217;s power, power, power in the site selection for data centers&#8221; &#8212; as these issues have been well publicized for years now, I&#8217;m pretty disappointed to see a prestigious blogger and writer so unaware of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7304</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry -- maybe I went a little AWOL.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I should perhaps do (or at least &lt;i&gt;attempt&lt;/i&gt;) a better job of explaining. So I&#039;ve put on a jazz record (instrumental music is always best for promoting &quot;free thought&quot; -- listening to Pat Metheny ;)....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The point (IMHO) is that the title is &quot;SearchBlog&quot;, not &quot;DataCenterBlog&quot; -- hmm,... maybe that already sums it up?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, OK, maybe more detail: Algorithms have become commoditized -- I think there&#039;s hardly anyone today who would dare to argue otherwise (counting links isn&#039;t exactly rocket science). So what is Google? A data center? A media business? Whose media?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So this seems to be a rather watershed point for the SearchBlog: Which way from here? The Internet is simply too big for a single search engine -- and I applaud Kamal Jain&#039;s commentary (indeed, it almost sounds like something I could have said):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;&lt;i&gt;In fact, for me personally, one search engine does not fit all my needs -- not Google, not Yahoo, and not even my own employer&#039;s (Microsoft) search engine. Often I know from my query type which search engine I want to try first. For an example, if I have an academic query I might try Google first. For commercial intent queries, I might try Live search first. If I precisely know what I want to buy, I might try Amazon first, but going forward I might try cashback.com to pocket some free money.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://battellemedia.com/archives/004489.php#comment_131688&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://battellemedia.com/archives/004489.php#comment_131688&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So perhaps it&#039;s time to start a DataCenterBlog, an OtherPeoplesMediaBlog, maybe an OpenSocialBlog or a GSpotBlog,... and maybe Danny can launch a DataCenterLand and maybe a PutAPinOnAMapLand, or maybe a GMoonLand,... I don&#039;t know -- I guess the possibilities are *endless*.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I think what is becoming clear is that the &quot;one-size fits-all&quot; notion of &quot;&lt;b&gt;search&lt;/b&gt;&quot; is &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt; outdated&lt;/i&gt; -- that &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; web 2.0. It&#039;s time to move on (or return?) to the web that is a &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;distributed&lt;/i&gt; network&lt;/b&gt; -- and that is one in which centralized data centers (again) sound quite old fashioned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I recently &quot;learned&quot; on a website populated primarily by teenagers that &quot;cloud computing&quot; does not refer to &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; cloud but rather to &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;many&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; clouds. Maybe your next book title could be (instead of &quot;&lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; Search&quot;): &quot;&lt;i&gt;Some&lt;/i&gt; Cloud&quot;(?)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8212; maybe I went a little AWOL.</p>
<p>I should perhaps do (or at least <i>attempt</i>) a better job of explaining. So I&#8217;ve put on a jazz record (instrumental music is always best for promoting &#8220;free thought&#8221; &#8212; listening to Pat Metheny <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;.</p>
<p>The point (IMHO) is that the title is &#8220;SearchBlog&#8221;, not &#8220;DataCenterBlog&#8221; &#8212; hmm,&#8230; maybe that already sums it up?</p>
<p>Well, OK, maybe more detail: Algorithms have become commoditized &#8212; I think there&#8217;s hardly anyone today who would dare to argue otherwise (counting links isn&#8217;t exactly rocket science). So what is Google? A data center? A media business? Whose media?</p>
<p>So this seems to be a rather watershed point for the SearchBlog: Which way from here? The Internet is simply too big for a single search engine &#8212; and I applaud Kamal Jain&#8217;s commentary (indeed, it almost sounds like something I could have said):</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>In fact, for me personally, one search engine does not fit all my needs &#8212; not Google, not Yahoo, and not even my own employer&#8217;s (Microsoft) search engine. Often I know from my query type which search engine I want to try first. For an example, if I have an academic query I might try Google first. For commercial intent queries, I might try Live search first. If I precisely know what I want to buy, I might try Amazon first, but going forward I might try cashback.com to pocket some free money.</i>&#8220;</p>
<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/004489.php#comment_131688" rel="nofollow">http://battellemedia.com/archives/004489.php#comment_131688</a></p>
<p>So perhaps it&#8217;s time to start a DataCenterBlog, an OtherPeoplesMediaBlog, maybe an OpenSocialBlog or a GSpotBlog,&#8230; and maybe Danny can launch a DataCenterLand and maybe a PutAPinOnAMapLand, or maybe a GMoonLand,&#8230; I don&#8217;t know &#8212; I guess the possibilities are *endless*.</p>
<p>But I think what is becoming clear is that the &#8220;one-size fits-all&#8221; notion of &#8220;<b>search</b>&#8221; is <i><b>now</b> outdated</i> &#8212; that <i>was</i> web 2.0. It&#8217;s time to move on (or return?) to the web that is a <b><i>distributed</i> network</b> &#8212; and that is one in which centralized data centers (again) sound quite old fashioned.</p>
<p>I recently &#8220;learned&#8221; on a website populated primarily by teenagers that &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; does not refer to <b><i>one</i></b> cloud but rather to <b><i>many</i></b> clouds. Maybe your next book title could be (instead of &#8220;<i>The</i> Search&#8221;): &#8220;<i>Some</i> Cloud&#8221;(?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Battelle</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7303</link>
		<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/06/lenoir_north_carolina.php#comment-7303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sheesh. First I misspell everything in the titles (I fixed that) then nmw hates the post. I just thought it was sweet, and the idea of a town competing so hard to get Googles server farms was touching. The idea that the town looked a lot like towns built by the railroads completed the thought, though I realize now I didn&#039;t really make the connection too well. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh. First I misspell everything in the titles (I fixed that) then nmw hates the post. I just thought it was sweet, and the idea of a town competing so hard to get Googles server farms was touching. The idea that the town looked a lot like towns built by the railroads completed the thought, though I realize now I didn&#8217;t really make the connection too well. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
