<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&apos;re In the Media Biz Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/02/youre_in_the_media_biz_now.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/02/youre_in_the_media_biz_now.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=youre_in_the_media_biz_now</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/02/youre_in_the_media_biz_now.php#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/02/youre_in_the_media_biz_now.php#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I first wondered over there on the AMEX blog that we might be part of the &lt;i&gt;conversation&lt;/i&gt; business. But we&#039;re not, since a conversation doesn&#039;t always materialize where you expect it to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s better to say that we&#039;re all in the documentation business. We &lt;i&gt;construct&lt;/i&gt; media, not because we&#039;re going to have a conversation *today*, but to have one in the future, if we&#039;re lucky, across many generations, with many readers, Talmudic-style. I would venture a hypothesis that the most successful businesses (and open source projects) have the best documentation, but I do not have full time to test it out. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The document culture operates between us like so: &lt;br /&gt;
You write a blog post about Google in 2004, and you expand it to a book in 2005, and I first become aware of it in 2006, and then I &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/The_Search_For_News&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;write a 3,000-word response to it&lt;/a&gt; in 2007 (ok, in December), and, now that it is 2008, perhaps we may talk about it now, such that you can fulfill your promise &quot;I am committed to updating this work at the Searchblog site.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No rush... Media (in the strict sense of the term) is ephemeral, but documents persist.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first wondered over there on the AMEX blog that we might be part of the <i>conversation</i> business. But we&#8217;re not, since a conversation doesn&#8217;t always materialize where you expect it to.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better to say that we&#8217;re all in the documentation business. We <i>construct</i> media, not because we&#8217;re going to have a conversation *today*, but to have one in the future, if we&#8217;re lucky, across many generations, with many readers, Talmudic-style. I would venture a hypothesis that the most successful businesses (and open source projects) have the best documentation, but I do not have full time to test it out. </p>
<p>The document culture operates between us like so: <br />
You write a blog post about Google in 2004, and you expand it to a book in 2005, and I first become aware of it in 2006, and then I <a href="http://civilities.net/The_Search_For_News" rel="nofollow">write a 3,000-word response to it</a> in 2007 (ok, in December), and, now that it is 2008, perhaps we may talk about it now, such that you can fulfill your promise &#8220;I am committed to updating this work at the Searchblog site.&#8221;</p>
<p>No rush&#8230; Media (in the strict sense of the term) is ephemeral, but documents persist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
