<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please, Don&apos;t Make Me Yell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=please_dont_make_me_yell</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8772</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am a former Yellow Book employee. It would not surprise me at all if Google decided to buy Yell for the entire package it would bring them. Especially with Yell being down 50% (aprx.) from where the were a year ago. Yell corporate has made a huge push in the last 12 months to really pump up online advertising from all customers. Yes, it could be to just improve overall profit, but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me a bit if they were making themselves much more attractive for a &quot;google&quot; type company. $5 billion wouldn&#039;t put a dent into Brin &amp; Co&#039;s fortune &amp; it would give them a 5,000 person sales force to market to small/mid range businesses in major markets. We&#039;ll just have to wait &amp; see.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a former Yellow Book employee. It would not surprise me at all if Google decided to buy Yell for the entire package it would bring them. Especially with Yell being down 50% (aprx.) from where the were a year ago. Yell corporate has made a huge push in the last 12 months to really pump up online advertising from all customers. Yes, it could be to just improve overall profit, but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me a bit if they were making themselves much more attractive for a &#8220;google&#8221; type company. $5 billion wouldn&#8217;t put a dent into Brin &#038; Co&#8217;s fortune &#038; it would give them a 5,000 person sales force to market to small/mid range businesses in major markets. We&#8217;ll just have to wait &#038; see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desire Athow</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8771</link>
		<dc:creator>Desire Athow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Guys, guys, guys... It is all down to a quiet week and some watercooler talk.. except that rather than talking about the new hot chick, they talk about Google&#039;s next billion pound acquisition... Snip from the article... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;As the market donned tin hats for a second day of losses, only Yell Group had traders shouting about potential takeovers; the latest reheated bid story on a quiet week.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Another source said: &quot;These rumours were doing the rounds about a year ago. Normally they would come out as idle chat on a quiet day.&quot;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More seriously though... Yell would allow Google to exploit the UK SME/Corporate sector more effectively as Yellow Pages are still big business here. There&#039;s a potentially lucrative match to be done with Google Maps but...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At USD 5 bn, Yell might be a bit too expensive for Google... Better invest elsewhere or wait for the stock prices to fall even more. As a footnote, Yell, unlike say Youtube, is all about Quality, not quantity. It is the 124th most visited website in the UK but managed to generate more than USD 4 bn worth of revenue in 2007 with profits of nearly 500m.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just a few lines for your ramblings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, guys, guys&#8230; It is all down to a quiet week and some watercooler talk.. except that rather than talking about the new hot chick, they talk about Google&#8217;s next billion pound acquisition&#8230; Snip from the article&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;As the market donned tin hats for a second day of losses, only Yell Group had traders shouting about potential takeovers; the latest reheated bid story on a quiet week.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Another source said: &#8220;These rumours were doing the rounds about a year ago. Normally they would come out as idle chat on a quiet day.&#8221;"</p>
<p>More seriously though&#8230; Yell would allow Google to exploit the UK SME/Corporate sector more effectively as Yellow Pages are still big business here. There&#8217;s a potentially lucrative match to be done with Google Maps but&#8230;</p>
<p>At USD 5 bn, Yell might be a bit too expensive for Google&#8230; Better invest elsewhere or wait for the stock prices to fall even more. As a footnote, Yell, unlike say Youtube, is all about Quality, not quantity. It is the 124th most visited website in the UK but managed to generate more than USD 4 bn worth of revenue in 2007 with profits of nearly 500m.</p>
<p>Just a few lines for your ramblings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that mysterious &quot;Mr Source&quot; does get about a bit.  Nearly as much as &quot;Mr Insider&quot;.  Anybody that still believes hacks within the national press in Britain still look for two sources before printing are more than a little nieve.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said all of that i do believe that the quality of journalism in the UK remains higher than it is anywhere else in the world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Its also true to say that some journalists at tabloids... of which the Indie seems to be trying to copy have vivid imaginations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that mysterious &#8220;Mr Source&#8221; does get about a bit.  Nearly as much as &#8220;Mr Insider&#8221;.  Anybody that still believes hacks within the national press in Britain still look for two sources before printing are more than a little nieve.</p>
<p>Having said all of that i do believe that the quality of journalism in the UK remains higher than it is anywhere else in the world.</p>
<p>Its also true to say that some journalists at tabloids&#8230; of which the Indie seems to be trying to copy have vivid imaginations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Richardson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8769</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2008/01/please_dont_make_me_yell.php#comment-8769</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately it has been forever so here in the UK!  The press still lives by the old adage &#039;Don&#039;t let the truth get in the way of a good story&#039;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it has been forever so here in the UK!  The press still lives by the old adage &#8216;Don&#8217;t let the truth get in the way of a good story&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
