<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is YouTube Profitable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is_youtube_profitable</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Serge and Larry don&#039;t own it anymore. Now maybe YouTube is profitable, maybe it&#039;s still in its grace period, and maybe Google will one day make up its investment on it&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge and Larry don&#8217;t own it anymore. Now maybe YouTube is profitable, maybe it&#8217;s still in its grace period, and maybe Google will one day make up its investment on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Seibert</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John - couldn&#039;t disagree more strongly with you here.  I agree that something doesn&#039;t need to be profitable for a &lt;em&gt;short&lt;/em&gt; while during a ramp up or branding stage, but you can&#039;t keep funneling cash into something that isn&#039;t giving you returns - especially since Google&#039;s public.  While investors are giving it a free path at the moment, that will change one day.  Serge and Larry don&#039;t own it anymore.  Now maybe YouTube is profitable, maybe it&#039;s still in its grace period, and maybe Google will one day make up its investment on it - but nothing can be a sink hole forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; couldn&#8217;t disagree more strongly with you here.  I agree that something doesn&#8217;t need to be profitable for a <em>short</em> while during a ramp up or branding stage, but you can&#8217;t keep funneling cash into something that isn&#8217;t giving you returns &#8211; especially since Google&#8217;s public.  While investors are giving it a free path at the moment, that will change one day.  Serge and Larry don&#8217;t own it anymore.  Now maybe YouTube is profitable, maybe it&#8217;s still in its grace period, and maybe Google will one day make up its investment on it &#8211; but nothing can be a sink hole forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8924</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8924</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think the Viacom suit might damage Google, but now I think they were wise to take on YouTube with all of its risks. It just makes their service more versatile to more users.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think the Viacom suit might damage Google, but now I think they were wise to take on YouTube with all of its risks. It just makes their service more versatile to more users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;*snifs a bubble&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*snifs a bubble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Jackson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8922</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The bandwidth for youtube must cost an absolute fortune! Saying that the adverts must be generating a lot of money too. I dont really like youtube, all of the videos are very poor quality anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Advertising on YouTube is fairly successful though! I picked it up on a blog... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesbrausch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jamesbrausch.com&lt;/a&gt; I think!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bandwidth for youtube must cost an absolute fortune! Saying that the adverts must be generating a lot of money too. I dont really like youtube, all of the videos are very poor quality anyway.</p>
<p>Advertising on YouTube is fairly successful though! I picked it up on a blog&#8230; <a href="http://www.jamesbrausch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesbrausch.com</a> I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think so.. Google is a giant, but it&#039;s not the only one... &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so.. Google is a giant, but it&#8217;s not the only one&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8920</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/12/is_youtube_profitable.php#comment-8920</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just like napster was the most important music distribution service in the world for a while.  I&#039;m not saying YouTube will die but I don&#039;t think it will maintain anywhere near its importance now that the content owners are getting a clue and not putting up with them.  Since hulu launched I go there a lot more than youtube.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like napster was the most important music distribution service in the world for a while.  I&#8217;m not saying YouTube will die but I don&#8217;t think it will maintain anywhere near its importance now that the content owners are getting a clue and not putting up with them.  Since hulu launched I go there a lot more than youtube.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
