free html hit counter November 2007 | Page 4 of 7 | John Battelle's Search Blog

Lite Week

By - November 14, 2007

This week is very full, we had staff meetings all day Monday, an all day meeting with the folks at Boing Boing yesterday, all day today at GigaOm’s NewTeeVee Live, and tomorrow I’m flying to Las Vegas for the day, to take part in a CMO conference. In short, exhausting but good week, but very little time to write.

I hate when I can’t write.

  • Content Marquee

RIP, SearchMob

By - November 13, 2007

Well, it was cool for a while, but SearchMob did not work for any number of reasons, including my lack of attention to it, spammers, technical difficulties, and, well, a failure to get critical mass. I’m yanking it today, and I plan to introduce easier to use community features that are less susceptible to spam soon. Thanks to those who contributed, but this particular commons turned to tragedy over time…

We Got Your Ten Million Right Here

By -

Logo Android

Ten million seems to be the magic figure lately. Or…maybe not. It was the amount Sergey mentioned as the bogey when he announced the founders award at Google (an award that doesn’t seem to stop folks from pursuing new startups our side of Google). Then $10 million came up as the amount Facebook was willing to fork over as an incentive to its own developers, as it launched and nourished its then-new Platform.

Now, Google has pledged another $10 million prize: for developers who will use its Android mobile platform. Shit, I’m in the wrong biz. Time to become a developer…

Marissa In Action

By -

The search space is again heating up, as social search takes center stage due to the MySpace and Facebook incursions on Google’s stranglehold. I had a very interesting talk today with Chamath Palihapitiya, VP of Product Marketing & Operations at Facebook, more on that soon. But it came to mind as I reviewed this interview on Om Malik’s show (thanks for the tip, Ben). Marissa talks about a lot of things, but I can’t help wondering how much of her time is worrying about social search, about which Venturebeat reports she’s less than enthusiastic.

Google Denies Legal JARGon

By - November 11, 2007

Well, it sure took a while (11 years), but Northeastern University claims to own the patent on Google’s approach to search (its intellectual property spawned a company called Jarg). So it sued last week. Thanks to Gary, who has the docs, for the tip.

Google responds in the linked Cnet story that the suit is “without merit.”

Reader JG writes: Then

By - November 09, 2007

< ![CDATA[

Reader JG writes: Then again, power users don’t click ads. So maybe this is the elephant in the room that no one is talking about.
]]> Read More Read More

On The Link Between Search and Branding

By -

Why won’t Yahoo or Microsoft ever spin out search, as I and others have counseled in the past? I had an opportunity to bat that question around with a particularly well informed fellow this week, and the most interesting part of the answer became quite obvious to me: They need search to protect what they already have: Brand advertising.

Before you declare “What are you smoking, Battelle!?” – it is Friday, but it’s not quite noon, guys – let’s pick this one apart a bit.

Traditional thinking around categories of advertising draw a very clear line between search advertising, which given its deep roots in CPC is seen as driven by direct response (DR), and brand advertising, which has awareness and demand creation as its main goals.

Most agencies, until recently, have stuck search (SEM, SEO) inside a speciality arm of their holdings, usually lumped in with their DR functions. Brand, on the other hand, was where all the cool kids live, making award winning creative that compelled, convinced, cajoled.

The history of online advertising has been marked by three major eras. The first era – 1995-2000 – was dominated by brand advertising, in particular, crappy brand advertising that, for the most part, didn’t work very well for any number of reasons. The second era was dominated by direct response advertising – the rise of search and the yellow pages model. The third era – the era we are in right now – marks the reconciliation of these two forms. If you look at the percentage of online spend presently represented by search, you can see what I am talking about: Search is the largest single factor, at 40%, followed by display + rich media, at about 30%, and classified at 18% or so.

So why am I arguing that the two will merge? Because I have been listening to customers – the marketers. And they are starting to realize a couple things.

First, they are noticing that when they run brand advertising both online and off, searches for their brands increase. Second, they are noticing that when searches for their brands increase, sales (or at least valuable, measureable leads) follow. And they certainly want searches for their brands to increase. But they have noticed something else as well: There’s a lot of stuff that comes up when folks search for their brands that they don’t control. In particular, there’s a ton of messaging out there – the equivalent of brand advertising, in a sense – that reflects the world’s view of their brand.

So the trick is this: How to coordinate the two sides? In a world dominated by conversational media, how does one truly integrate demand creation (branding) with demand fulfillment (search)? The answer is not as easy as one might think.

Evo

Search results, as we know, are more than paid results. Organic results are critical to a person who is searching on a brand. If I see an ad for the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, for example, and I put that into Google, what do I see? (see image above)

I’ve marked in green all the sites that, from the point of view of a marketer, not in that marketer’s control. Each of them, it turns out, are conversational media sites – forums, blogs, photosharing sites, wikipedia – where the brand is being actively discussed. Try this search for any number of specific brands, and it’s surprising how often this occurs.

In short, there are a lot of conversations out there that marketers can’t “control”, but that are vital to the brand’s perception, consideration, and performance. I have to run to an appt, but I’ll be updating this post with thoughts on what this means for Yahoo, Microsoft, Google, and Facebook, as solving for this issue is a key task that major advertising platforms – and all of the aforementioned companies are just that – must execute upon. Facebook’s announcement this week was a first step toward this, but it lacks several key factors necessary to create a fully realized ecosystem. But so far, no one else has that ecosystem either.

More on what such a system might look like when I get back…

The Power of Power Searchers

By -

Jc-Searchpercent2.1

I’ve posited this in the past, now Compete shows data that backs it (in as much as you buy Compete data):

What you find is that the top 1% of searchers performs a full 13% of all searches in a given month. If you extend this to the top 20% the number of queries increase to roughly 70%. So in contrast to the standard 80-20 pareto it appears that in web search there is roughly a 70-20 distribution. So what if we break this out by engine?

I (and I bet you) count myself in the category of power searcher – probably 25-50 searches a day. My mother, well, more like 1-5 a day. If that.

What I do wonder is whether Google et al are creating products for ME, or for my mother. This data would argue that they should be for me.