<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CM Summit Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cm_summit_videos</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElP</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php#comment-9504</link>
		<dc:creator>ElP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php#comment-9504</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Will you be posting a video of your conversation with Messrs. Levinsohn and Miller?  Where is your contact info on this blog?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you be posting a video of your conversation with Messrs. Levinsohn and Miller?  Where is your contact info on this blog?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmw</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php#comment-9503</link>
		<dc:creator>nmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/09/cm_summit_videos.php#comment-9503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW! Great presentation! I guess that explains (to some degree) why Google seems to be bamboozled by facebook. Let me attempt to list some more/less simple, coherent comments:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Command line? Google?!? This has got to be the most provocative statement of all -- but I think almost no one will really get the analogy and/or think it through to it&#039;s conclusion. If they did, they might recall that IBM was &quot;done in&quot; by someone who now looks like a dinosaur, too (but they&#039;ve also looked &quot;old-fashioned&quot; many times before ;). If they did, they would recall some marketing guru prone to throwing chairs begging and pleading to please &quot;stay the course&quot; instead of going to an &quot;open&quot; source. If the did, they might actually even get *past* 2.0 and begin to understand the Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. And then, if the stepped into this vast and open cyberspace, they would realize that the so-called &quot;command line&quot; no longer has any syntactical rules other than what the USERs decide: I type in battellemedia.com because I WANT to go there -- and that is IT. ;D&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. Wonderful stats -- let&#039;s try a little &quot;wisdom of the mob/crowds&quot; experiment: Can anyone tell me what &quot;property&quot; ranked just above FM (by unique visitors) in the comscore-screen? (that piece of meat is right where it belongs -- in the middle ;) I squinted and figured, came up with a rather simple metric: (Total Uniques) / (Average Daily) = X. Turns out, Myspace&#039;s and Facebook&#039;s X&#039;s are a reelin&#039; and a rockin&#039; (low -- a low score, I guess, indicates something like &quot;stickiness&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3. How much would you pay for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cellreception.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cellreception.com/&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;;D nmw&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! Great presentation! I guess that explains (to some degree) why Google seems to be bamboozled by facebook. Let me attempt to list some more/less simple, coherent comments:</p>
<p>1. Command line? Google?!? This has got to be the most provocative statement of all &#8212; but I think almost no one will really get the analogy and/or think it through to it&#8217;s conclusion. If they did, they might recall that IBM was &#8220;done in&#8221; by someone who now looks like a dinosaur, too (but they&#8217;ve also looked &#8220;old-fashioned&#8221; many times before <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . If they did, they would recall some marketing guru prone to throwing chairs begging and pleading to please &#8220;stay the course&#8221; instead of going to an &#8220;open&#8221; source. If the did, they might actually even get *past* 2.0 and begin to understand the Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. And then, if the stepped into this vast and open cyberspace, they would realize that the so-called &#8220;command line&#8221; no longer has any syntactical rules other than what the USERs decide: I type in battellemedia.com because I WANT to go there &#8212; and that is IT. ;D</p>
<p>2. Wonderful stats &#8212; let&#8217;s try a little &#8220;wisdom of the mob/crowds&#8221; experiment: Can anyone tell me what &#8220;property&#8221; ranked just above FM (by unique visitors) in the comscore-screen? (that piece of meat is right where it belongs &#8212; in the middle <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I squinted and figured, came up with a rather simple metric: (Total Uniques) / (Average Daily) = X. Turns out, Myspace&#8217;s and Facebook&#8217;s X&#8217;s are a reelin&#8217; and a rockin&#8217; (low &#8212; a low score, I guess, indicates something like &#8220;stickiness&#8221;).</p>
<p>3. How much would you pay for <a href="http://www.cellreception.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cellreception.com/</a> ?</p>
<p>;D nmw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
