<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;the more you share with Google, the more tailored your results will be&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotka</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php#comment-9846</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php#comment-9846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the interview link John&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interview link John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php#comment-9845</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/08/the_more_you_share_with_google_the_more_tailored_your_results_will_be.php#comment-9845</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fine.  Dandy.  Individual tailoring increases as a function of giving your information to Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the unanswered subtext is: Is the increasing function logarithmic, linear, or exponential?  Because if it is logarithmic, that means I share more information with Google than I get benefit from.  So while it remains technically true that tailoring continues to increase, while I keep sharing more information, Google is basically getting more out of the deal than I am.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And if the function is linear, if the amount of correct tailoring that I experience is directly proportional to the amount of information that I share, then at least Google and the individual have made a &quot;fair trade&quot;.  But another way of looking at that fair trade is &quot;zero sum&quot;.  I.e. I might has well have done all the tailoring myself, because what I am gaining in search efficiency I am giving up in privacy.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only way I see this as useful is if the function is exponential, i.e. if I gain exponentially more search efficiency and tailoring out of linearly more of my private data sharing.  Then, and only then, would it even make sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So telling me that tailoring increases as personal data sharing increases really tells me nothing.  I need to know the shape of the function.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine.  Dandy.  Individual tailoring increases as a function of giving your information to Google.</p>
<p>But the unanswered subtext is: Is the increasing function logarithmic, linear, or exponential?  Because if it is logarithmic, that means I share more information with Google than I get benefit from.  So while it remains technically true that tailoring continues to increase, while I keep sharing more information, Google is basically getting more out of the deal than I am.</p>
<p>And if the function is linear, if the amount of correct tailoring that I experience is directly proportional to the amount of information that I share, then at least Google and the individual have made a &#8220;fair trade&#8221;.  But another way of looking at that fair trade is &#8220;zero sum&#8221;.  I.e. I might has well have done all the tailoring myself, because what I am gaining in search efficiency I am giving up in privacy.  </p>
<p>The only way I see this as useful is if the function is exponential, i.e. if I gain exponentially more search efficiency and tailoring out of linearly more of my private data sharing.  Then, and only then, would it even make sense.</p>
<p>So telling me that tailoring increases as personal data sharing increases really tells me nothing.  I need to know the shape of the function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
