<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voice Post 2: Privacy, Ask, etc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php#comment-9927</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php#comment-9927</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om writes: &quot;For a nominal fee of say a $1 a month, they should offer us ability to erase our search behavior every week.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I agree with the spirit of Om&#039;s post, it really bothers me that we would have to pay extra to stop a search engine company from doing something that costs them extra, to begin with.  It would be cheaper for the search engines not to cache any queries because they wouldn&#039;t have to buy all the extra hard drives, and more processors to handle the caching and the data management.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So why should it cost me anything, for them to save even more money?  A premium service, in my mind, should be the one where I explicitly ask them to cache my queries so that I can make use of them, personally, later.  The default, non-premium service should be the one in which they don&#039;t spend the extra hardware, software, and electricity costs caching all my queries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om writes: &#8220;For a nominal fee of say a $1 a month, they should offer us ability to erase our search behavior every week.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I agree with the spirit of Om&#8217;s post, it really bothers me that we would have to pay extra to stop a search engine company from doing something that costs them extra, to begin with.  It would be cheaper for the search engines not to cache any queries because they wouldn&#8217;t have to buy all the extra hard drives, and more processors to handle the caching and the data management.</p>
<p>So why should it cost me anything, for them to save even more money?  A premium service, in my mind, should be the one where I explicitly ask them to cache my queries so that I can make use of them, personally, later.  The default, non-premium service should be the one in which they don&#8217;t spend the extra hardware, software, and electricity costs caching all my queries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Teare</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php#comment-9926</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Teare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/07/voice_post_2_privacy_ask_etc.php#comment-9926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now - if my baby realnames.com was still alive you could just say the keyword instead of calling out links :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe I should resusitate it. Hmmmm&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keith Teare&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now &#8211; if my baby realnames.com was still alive you could just say the keyword instead of calling out links <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Maybe I should resusitate it. Hmmmm</p>
<p>Keith Teare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
