<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google on the Way to 66% in US, Sez Fortune/Hitwise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php#comment-10938</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php#comment-10938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit that I&#039;m a bit surprised at this news.  As the previous commenter points out, Yahoo certainly sounded as if it was getting some traction with its release of Panama.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, there still could be some time delay in feeling its impact but to lose share truly seems surprising.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I&#8217;m a bit surprised at this news.  As the previous commenter points out, Yahoo certainly sounded as if it was getting some traction with its release of Panama.  </p>
<p>Nevertheless, there still could be some time delay in feeling its impact but to lose share truly seems surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asia</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>Asia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/04/google_on_the_way_to_66_in_us_sez_fortunehitwise.php#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome news! After all the ludicrous blog postings about how Yahoo&#039;s new algorithm is giving Google a run for it&#039;s money, I&#039;m so happy to see a post that proves otherwise. I got so annoyed that I unsubscribed to those very blogs - that&#039;ll teach &#039;em to lie to me. I honestly just don&#039;t see how the redundancy on Yahoo SERPS are better and how it will gain market share, in fact I wish they would go back to what it was pre-new algo. It was bad then, but so much better than what it is now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good job Google! Keep up the great work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome news! After all the ludicrous blog postings about how Yahoo&#8217;s new algorithm is giving Google a run for it&#8217;s money, I&#8217;m so happy to see a post that proves otherwise. I got so annoyed that I unsubscribed to those very blogs &#8211; that&#8217;ll teach &#8216;em to lie to me. I honestly just don&#8217;t see how the redundancy on Yahoo SERPS are better and how it will gain market share, in fact I wish they would go back to what it was pre-new algo. It was bad then, but so much better than what it is now.</p>
<p>Good job Google! Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
