<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Age on Conversational Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ad_age_on_conversational_marketing</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: o</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php#comment-11501</link>
		<dc:creator>o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php#comment-11501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well John, the article&#039;s thinking rates at 70% but the thinking gems you probably referrred to are:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; 80%]  It&#039;s a reasonable question. In journalism three is a trend, which makes five a phenomenon, and if I was looking for an original angle on the most overexposed ad event of the year, I&#039;d glom on to this consumer-generated-content thing too. Why not? It&#039;s an interesting sign of the times when John Doe can knock out a decent Doritos spot for less than it costs to top off your average ad exec&#039;s martini. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
76%]  But just as TV commercials are often mistaken for the sum-total output of a marketing department, so consumer-generated content is in danger of obscuring the bigger story here, which is that we&#039;re entering a new ad era -- the conversational marketing age. CGC -- yes, the acronym elves have already entered it into the jargon journal -- is the noisy herald to a quieter but arguably more important movement. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Power of the public&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;100%] Of course it is in part about consumers&#039; access to video-production and -distribution technologies, but it&#039;s also about the increasing sway they hold over any product&#039;s success. It&#039;s about the honest insight and information they offer that can help a company identify problems and opportunities on corporate and brand levels. It&#039;s even about their willingness to co-create with you the products they will later consume. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Spreading beyond tech&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;80%]   Diane Hessan, president-CEO of the fast-growing social network Communispace, is a student of the shift who points to, among other examples, Starwood Hotels, which recently invited hundreds of travel-savvy consumers to join a private online community and took their advice on everything from the name of its new brand to the design of the hotels. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
88%] &quot;Consumers want to be directly involved in providing advice that will lead to better products and brand experiences, and they want to be heard,&quot; says Hessan. &quot;This, not just ads, is at the heart of today&#039;s consumer-in-control marketing movement.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;Conversational marketing&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
100%]   I&#039;ll revisit Battelle soon, but in the meantime let&#039;s keep Doritos&#039; $13 ad in perspective as just one voice in a much larger conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well John, the article&#8217;s thinking rates at 70% but the thinking gems you probably referrred to are:</p>
<p> 80%]  It&#8217;s a reasonable question. In journalism three is a trend, which makes five a phenomenon, and if I was looking for an original angle on the most overexposed ad event of the year, I&#8217;d glom on to this consumer-generated-content thing too. Why not? It&#8217;s an interesting sign of the times when John Doe can knock out a decent Doritos spot for less than it costs to top off your average ad exec&#8217;s martini. </p>
<p>
76%]  But just as TV commercials are often mistaken for the sum-total output of a marketing department, so consumer-generated content is in danger of obscuring the bigger story here, which is that we&#8217;re entering a new ad era &#8212; the conversational marketing age. CGC &#8212; yes, the acronym elves have already entered it into the jargon journal &#8212; is the noisy herald to a quieter but arguably more important movement. </p>
<p>Power of the public</p>
<p>100%] Of course it is in part about consumers&#8217; access to video-production and -distribution technologies, but it&#8217;s also about the increasing sway they hold over any product&#8217;s success. It&#8217;s about the honest insight and information they offer that can help a company identify problems and opportunities on corporate and brand levels. It&#8217;s even about their willingness to co-create with you the products they will later consume. </p>
<p>
Spreading beyond tech</p>
<p>80%]   Diane Hessan, president-CEO of the fast-growing social network Communispace, is a student of the shift who points to, among other examples, Starwood Hotels, which recently invited hundreds of travel-savvy consumers to join a private online community and took their advice on everything from the name of its new brand to the design of the hotels. </p>
<p>
88%] &#8220;Consumers want to be directly involved in providing advice that will lead to better products and brand experiences, and they want to be heard,&#8221; says Hessan. &#8220;This, not just ads, is at the heart of today&#8217;s consumer-in-control marketing movement.&#8221; </p>
<p>
&#8216;Conversational marketing&#8217;<br />
100%]   I&#8217;ll revisit Battelle soon, but in the meantime let&#8217;s keep Doritos&#8217; $13 ad in perspective as just one voice in a much larger conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lurie</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php#comment-11500</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Lurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2007/02/ad_age_on_conversational_marketing.php#comment-11500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just a small shameless plug that might lend to the discussion: I&#039;ve been writing about conversation-style marketing for quite a while: www.conversationmarketing.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The consumer-driven stuff is all well and good, but in the end organizations have to take responsibility for messages that really speak to their audience. Great article!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small shameless plug that might lend to the discussion: I&#8217;ve been writing about conversation-style marketing for quite a while: <a href="http://www.conversationmarketing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.conversationmarketing.com</a>.</p>
<p>The consumer-driven stuff is all well and good, but in the end organizations have to take responsibility for messages that really speak to their audience. Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
