<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam, but What Kind?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spam_but_what_kind</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael SEOG</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12345</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael SEOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Like graywolf said, they are trying to make unique text to make it less likely to be flagged by Google for duplicate content and eliminated from the index. This helps them to drop links in their splogs with the aim of their target website ranking higher. Plus any incidental traffic they might get from the splogs and the random text.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I see a lot of this in Google Blog Search -- it doesn&#039;t seem to have many filters to detect this stuff and not show it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like graywolf said, they are trying to make unique text to make it less likely to be flagged by Google for duplicate content and eliminated from the index. This helps them to drop links in their splogs with the aim of their target website ranking higher. Plus any incidental traffic they might get from the splogs and the random text.</p>
<p>I see a lot of this in Google Blog Search &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t seem to have many filters to detect this stuff and not show it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSaysThis</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12344</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSaysThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12344</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When I was weeding out spam for my last company, the vast majority of it pointed to .info domains, which I think was because they are (were?) so cheaply available.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was weeding out spam for my last company, the vast majority of it pointed to .info domains, which I think was because they are (were?) so cheaply available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12343</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/spam_but_what_kind.php#comment-12343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;they are &quot;uniqifying&quot; the text in hopes of not being flagged as dupe content.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are &#8220;uniqifying&#8221; the text in hopes of not being flagged as dupe content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
