<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Blog Search Tops Technorati</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_blog_search_tops_technorati</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aşk</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12075</link>
		<dc:creator>aşk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google blog search? new service?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google blog search? new service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gio</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12074</link>
		<dc:creator>gio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think its because of the &quot;Tip&quot; Google is inserting on top of  the results that made this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its because of the &#8220;Tip&#8221; Google is inserting on top of  the results that made this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ituloy angsulong</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12073</link>
		<dc:creator>ituloy angsulong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The domination of Google across almost everything technical is truly amazing. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The domination of Google across almost everything technical is truly amazing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Ward</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12072</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Both of those engines are woefully short of providing any idea of just how good their coverage is, what their refresh rates are, and how to measure they&#039;re consistent performance.  Has anyone ever really tested them?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of those engines are woefully short of providing any idea of just how good their coverage is, what their refresh rates are, and how to measure they&#8217;re consistent performance.  Has anyone ever really tested them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave White</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12071</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I do not agree that Google is nothing more than isolation.&lt;br /&gt;
i do understand and respect the feelings that other people have for Google.But i also appreciate the fact that it is Google that has given the online industry a better direction and a organized way to things.It has a major contribution in setting good online standards which were not in existence at all. &lt;br /&gt;
The amount of business that every individual generates from Google and other search engines is unbelievable.&lt;br /&gt;
Google has again proved itself and it support staff for out beating Technorati in terms of hits.Nothing seems to be impossible for Google.&lt;br /&gt;
This also seems to be a a warning to several others where Google may run over.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree that Google is nothing more than isolation.<br />
i do understand and respect the feelings that other people have for Google.But i also appreciate the fact that it is Google that has given the online industry a better direction and a organized way to things.It has a major contribution in setting good online standards which were not in existence at all. <br />
The amount of business that every individual generates from Google and other search engines is unbelievable.<br />
Google has again proved itself and it support staff for out beating Technorati in terms of hits.Nothing seems to be impossible for Google.<br />
This also seems to be a a warning to several others where Google may run over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamás Kádár</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamás Kádár</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Search is useful to separate people, everywhere the news. Everywhere rubbish. Everywhere Google, everywhere China, everywhere words without power.  Everywhere Technocrats.&lt;br /&gt;
Google , Yahoo is nothing more than isolation. More isolation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search is useful to separate people, everywhere the news. Everywhere rubbish. Everywhere Google, everywhere China, everywhere words without power.  Everywhere Technocrats.<br />
Google , Yahoo is nothing more than isolation. More isolation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Cash</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12069</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Cash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12069</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not Surprising. What every Google trys, it seems to come out on top.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Surprising. What every Google trys, it seems to come out on top.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Linden</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12068</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/12/google_blog_search_tops_technorati.php#comment-12068</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google Blog Search (blogsearch.google.com) and Blogger Search (search.blogger.com) are the same thing, are they not?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html#findit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html#findit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the only difference is the interface.  Same underlying search engine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, it probably would be appropriate to combine the traffic numbers for blogsearch.google.com and search.blogger.com to get the total usage for Google Blog Search.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Blog Search (blogsearch.google.com) and Blogger Search (search.blogger.com) are the same thing, are they not?</p>
<p>See</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html#findit" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html#findit</a></p>
<p>I think the only difference is the interface.  Same underlying search engine.</p>
<p>So, it probably would be appropriate to combine the traffic numbers for blogsearch.google.com and search.blogger.com to get the total usage for Google Blog Search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
