<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Was Going To Use FAST Technology, But Will It Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spector</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13018</link>
		<dc:creator>Spector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13018</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My experience from using FAST technology is very good -- would be a shame if YouTube has to implement an inferior solution from Google just because of this. I thought Google was going to improve the YouTube experience, not make it worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience from using FAST technology is very good &#8212; would be a shame if YouTube has to implement an inferior solution from Google just because of this. I thought Google was going to improve the YouTube experience, not make it worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13017</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13017</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Enterprise search is really not that exciting. User experience with products from companies like FAST, Autonomy (Verity) has been far inferior from what people have come to expect from GYM. My take: Google will junk FAST contract with YouTube. The company is anyway under investigation for creative revenue reporting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise search is really not that exciting. User experience with products from companies like FAST, Autonomy (Verity) has been far inferior from what people have come to expect from GYM. My take: Google will junk FAST contract with YouTube. The company is anyway under investigation for creative revenue reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumbfounder</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13016</link>
		<dc:creator>dumbfounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/youtube_was_going_to_use_fast_technology_but_will_it_now.php#comment-13016</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please ask them how customized the planned solution was. If it was just them throwing standard search at the problem then I can&#039;t imagine it would be all that compelling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please ask them how customized the planned solution was. If it was just them throwing standard search at the problem then I can&#8217;t imagine it would be all that compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
