<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update On Google and The Spooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update_on_google_and_the_spooks</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wfeather</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12750</link>
		<dc:creator>wfeather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12750</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Has Google released search-related information to any branch of the government, or government subcontractors?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wrong question. Has Google shared any of their proprietary algorithms with the government so that the NSA can make better use of the data they&#039;ve already collected and stored?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Has Google released search-related information to any branch of the government, or government subcontractors?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong question. Has Google shared any of their proprietary algorithms with the government so that the NSA can make better use of the data they&#8217;ve already collected and stored?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SEO Tips</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12749</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SEO Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12749</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the update. Google has to protect its users’ privacy and keep a clean image to keep its market position. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update. Google has to protect its users’ privacy and keep a clean image to keep its market position. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong Bakos</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12748</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong Bakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posing the followup question and post John.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To me, the updated answer from google is &quot;yes,&quot; flavored with the traditional pr &#039;turnaround&#039; and &#039;spin&#039; of providing irrelevant statements comparing products/services provided to the commercial sector vs. what we&#039;re really asking, about which google does not &#039;discuss publicly.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you read an old, hard-to-find book called Privacy and Freedom? If you have time, check it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posing the followup question and post John.</p>
<p>To me, the updated answer from google is &#8220;yes,&#8221; flavored with the traditional pr &#8216;turnaround&#8217; and &#8216;spin&#8217; of providing irrelevant statements comparing products/services provided to the commercial sector vs. what we&#8217;re really asking, about which google does not &#8216;discuss publicly.&#8217;</p>
<p>Have you read an old, hard-to-find book called Privacy and Freedom? If you have time, check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kid mercury</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12747</link>
		<dc:creator>kid mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks a lot for continuing to follow up on this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks a lot for continuing to follow up on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kid mercury</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>kid mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 13:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;john -- thanks for your diligence in following up and reporting on this matter, i&#039;m sure many people appreciate your journalistic integrity in reporting and following up on an issue that most industry blogs/publications are too cowardly to comment on or too naive to view as newsworthy. so thanks a lot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;while many are quick to dismiss it as trivial and rumor-mongering, anyone familiar with the history of the CIA knows that this could turn very, very ugly and that the CIA has a long history of using private corporations to accomplish its objectives (often to get stuff done that they don&#039;t want to get caught doing -- see ex-CIA officer victor marchetti&#039;s book &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/CIA-Cult-Intelligence-Victor-Marchetti/dp/0394482395&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the CIA and the cult of intelligence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; for a detailed account of such activities).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i find it a bit worrisome that google has not commented about this at all directly on any of their countless blogs -- isn&#039;t that what blogs are for? so that they can communicate directly with their audience rather than communicating through you? commenting through you will raise some eyebrows because it allows them to blame you if in fact they are lying (just as the CIA can blame google if they ever get caught, i.e. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;plausible deniability&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;anyway, thanks again for your ongoing coverage, i hope if you come across more info you will continue to share.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john &#8212; thanks for your diligence in following up and reporting on this matter, i&#8217;m sure many people appreciate your journalistic integrity in reporting and following up on an issue that most industry blogs/publications are too cowardly to comment on or too naive to view as newsworthy. so thanks a lot.</p>
<p>while many are quick to dismiss it as trivial and rumor-mongering, anyone familiar with the history of the CIA knows that this could turn very, very ugly and that the CIA has a long history of using private corporations to accomplish its objectives (often to get stuff done that they don&#8217;t want to get caught doing &#8212; see ex-CIA officer victor marchetti&#8217;s book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/CIA-Cult-Intelligence-Victor-Marchetti/dp/0394482395" rel="nofollow">the CIA and the cult of intelligence</a></em> for a detailed account of such activities).</p>
<p>i find it a bit worrisome that google has not commented about this at all directly on any of their countless blogs &#8212; isn&#8217;t that what blogs are for? so that they can communicate directly with their audience rather than communicating through you? commenting through you will raise some eyebrows because it allows them to blame you if in fact they are lying (just as the CIA can blame google if they ever get caught, i.e. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability" rel="nofollow">plausible deniability</a>).</p>
<p>anyway, thanks again for your ongoing coverage, i hope if you come across more info you will continue to share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmanuel</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12745</link>
		<dc:creator>emmanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/11/update_on_google_and_the_spooks.php#comment-12745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ps.i would like to know how long will it take us to understand,we have to live Iraq.........for better? The mission has failed and we have to get out now!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ps.i would like to know how long will it take us to understand,we have to live Iraq&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;for better? The mission has failed and we have to get out now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
