Comments on: The Google – YouTube Deal- coverage roundup http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more. Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: David Dalka http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13337 David Dalka Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:04:10 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13337 <p>I agree with KP's point, many companies don't invest enough in customer engangement and promotion.</p> I agree with KP’s point, many companies don’t invest enough in customer engangement and promotion.

]]> By: Jerry http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13336 Jerry Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:50:49 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13336 <p>But YouTube wasn't even making a profit! And they were struggling to find a means to even look close to doing so. Why did Google have to pay so much? It's a good marriage but I just don't get how they arbitrarily came up with the end sum</p> But YouTube wasn’t even making a profit! And they were struggling to find a means to even look close to doing so. Why did Google have to pay so much? It’s a good marriage but I just don’t get how they arbitrarily came up with the end sum

]]> By: Alan http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13335 Alan Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:26:34 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13335 <p>1.5 Billion Dollars could build a heck of a lot more than a relatively simple popularity contest for videos.</p> 1.5 Billion Dollars could build a heck of a lot more than a relatively simple popularity contest for videos.

]]> By: Billiger http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13334 Billiger Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:12:48 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13334 <p>Sometimes it is better, to buy a running company than try to develop a contrahent.</p> Sometimes it is better, to buy a running company than try to develop a contrahent.

]]> By: KP http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13333 KP Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:04:19 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13333 <p>YouTube is cool, but why didn't Google spend all the money on marketing instead? They could have dominated their own marketing channel(google adwords) for quite some time for all that money?</p> <p>Was it because Youtube had deals with the publishers?</p> YouTube is cool, but why didn’t Google spend all the money on marketing instead? They could have dominated their own marketing channel(google adwords) for quite some time for all that money?

Was it because Youtube had deals with the publishers?

]]> By: Pramit http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13332 Pramit Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:19:17 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/the_google_-_youtube_deal-_coverage_roundup.php#comment-13332 <p>I wonder ehen will they call up bloggers to attend conference calls. I have done a comprehensive coverage of all the GoogTube issues on my site.</p> I wonder ehen will they call up bloggers to attend conference calls. I have done a comprehensive coverage of all the GoogTube issues on my site.

]]>