<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Yahoo Up For Grabs? Fred Speculates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Thrasher</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13281</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Thrasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The acquisition of Yahoo by Microsoft has been debated for years. (John originally published this post in 2006.) Now, in 2008, Microsoft has made it&#039;s move, publicly offering $44.6 billion for Yahoo. The deal isn&#039;t nailed to the floor, apparently. It seems Microsoft is lobbying investors to take the money and run. Given the attrition among Yahoo&#039;s management, the continuing bad press, and the declining stock price, it seems Yahoo investors may take Microsoft&#039;s suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Despite the challenges inherent in integrating these two company&#039;s product and service offerings, it&#039;s Microsoft&#039;s best move to make good on its promise to become one of the two major players in digital advertising. It&#039;s a bold tactical move in a strategy that spans decades. It will be interesting to see the results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The acquisition of Yahoo by Microsoft has been debated for years. (John originally published this post in 2006.) Now, in 2008, Microsoft has made it&#8217;s move, publicly offering $44.6 billion for Yahoo. The deal isn&#8217;t nailed to the floor, apparently. It seems Microsoft is lobbying investors to take the money and run. Given the attrition among Yahoo&#8217;s management, the continuing bad press, and the declining stock price, it seems Yahoo investors may take Microsoft&#8217;s suggestion.</p>
<p>Despite the challenges inherent in integrating these two company&#8217;s product and service offerings, it&#8217;s Microsoft&#8217;s best move to make good on its promise to become one of the two major players in digital advertising. It&#8217;s a bold tactical move in a strategy that spans decades. It will be interesting to see the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13280</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Yahoo is still strong and it is better to have different options for end users. That will lead to further progress as happened in the past. Monopoly always sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Yahoo is still strong and it is better to have different options for end users. That will lead to further progress as happened in the past. Monopoly always sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidEzra</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13279</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidEzra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Although I&#039;m not the biggest fan of Yahoo (too many ads), it&#039;s my opinion that Microsoft would &quot;kill&quot; any good remaining in Yahoo.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doesn&#039;t Microsoft already own their own search engine?  A Microsoft owned Yahoo would quickly become &quot;MICROnized&quot; to the point that it would be no better than Microsoft&#039;s current offerings.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(To bad Microsoft can&#039;t purchase Yahoo and become &quot;YAHOOized / ENERGized&quot; to the point that they become &quot;not so evil.&quot;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m not the biggest fan of Yahoo (too many ads), it&#8217;s my opinion that Microsoft would &#8220;kill&#8221; any good remaining in Yahoo.  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Microsoft already own their own search engine?  A Microsoft owned Yahoo would quickly become &#8220;MICROnized&#8221; to the point that it would be no better than Microsoft&#8217;s current offerings.  </p>
<p>(To bad Microsoft can&#8217;t purchase Yahoo and become &#8220;YAHOOized / ENERGized&#8221; to the point that they become &#8220;not so evil.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13278</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with Gopi.  Culture of the MS LIVE is something like Yahoo and together MS and Yahoo would at least be able to *scare* Google for Halloween.  Maybe.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Gopi.  Culture of the MS LIVE is something like Yahoo and together MS and Yahoo would at least be able to *scare* Google for Halloween.  Maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TagMan</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13277</link>
		<dc:creator>TagMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 04:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No, Yahoo wouldn&#039;t want to be acquired by Microsoft.  Could you imagine the culture clash?  Wouldn&#039;t be nearly as bad as AOL-Time Warner but would be difficult to mesh the two cultures.  Plus, with Yahoo&#039;s recent successful Hack Day, I suspect they&#039;ve overcome some inertia.  They need to fix their legacy (Overture) paid search platform.  The delays on that front aren&#039;t helping the perception on Wall Street.  Plus, they have great &quot;web 2.0 / social media&quot; assets like Flickr and del.icio.us.  They just need to integrate and monetize these assets.  Merging with Microsoft?  No way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Yahoo wouldn&#8217;t want to be acquired by Microsoft.  Could you imagine the culture clash?  Wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as bad as AOL-Time Warner but would be difficult to mesh the two cultures.  Plus, with Yahoo&#8217;s recent successful Hack Day, I suspect they&#8217;ve overcome some inertia.  They need to fix their legacy (Overture) paid search platform.  The delays on that front aren&#8217;t helping the perception on Wall Street.  Plus, they have great &#8220;web 2.0 / social media&#8221; assets like Flickr and del.icio.us.  They just need to integrate and monetize these assets.  Merging with Microsoft?  No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13276</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My money is on a Yahoo 2.0&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My money is on a Yahoo 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13275</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/10/is_yahoo_up_for_grabs_fred_speculates.php#comment-13275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Acquiring Yahoo is the best way for MS to deal with google. This would be really an match made in heaven - Yahoo&#039;s brand/content/advertisers/search technology and Microsoft distribution power (With the coming IE7 search box)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquiring Yahoo is the best way for MS to deal with google. This would be really an match made in heaven &#8211; Yahoo&#8217;s brand/content/advertisers/search technology and Microsoft distribution power (With the coming IE7 search box)</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
