<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Looks to Avoid Becoming a Xerox of Kleenex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clumpy</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14081</link>
		<dc:creator>Clumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When we say &quot;Google&quot;, we really MEAN using the Google search engine. Google the product is popular, and only inept people would say &quot;Google&quot; when they really mean &quot;use Yahoo.&quot; The ability to verb Google without it sounding artificial or referring to another product is undoubtedly one of the strengths of the product.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we say &#8220;Google&#8221;, we really MEAN using the Google search engine. Google the product is popular, and only inept people would say &#8220;Google&#8221; when they really mean &#8220;use Yahoo.&#8221; The ability to verb Google without it sounding artificial or referring to another product is undoubtedly one of the strengths of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isulong seoph</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14080</link>
		<dc:creator>isulong seoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;that&#039;s silly, but they can&#039;t help being so popular. google has been more of a widely-used jargon when you wanna tell someone to search something via google. i guess that&#039;s an inevitable factor, considering Britney&#039;s case, Britney is also used as an adjective now, purporting to someone who acts or looks like Britney.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s silly, but they can&#8217;t help being so popular. google has been more of a widely-used jargon when you wanna tell someone to search something via google. i guess that&#8217;s an inevitable factor, considering Britney&#8217;s case, Britney is also used as an adjective now, purporting to someone who acts or looks like Britney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Everything about that letter seems geared to suggest to the recipient that they shouldn&#039;t take it too seriously - hand-addressed, snail-mail, silly examples. I&#039;d like to think Google are just doing what they legally have to do to be seen to maintain the trademark, without really wanting people to stop using the word casually. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also think that so long as the people using it are actually referring to the use of Google, rather than another search engine, that it shouldn&#039;t be seen as degrading their trademark.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything about that letter seems geared to suggest to the recipient that they shouldn&#8217;t take it too seriously &#8211; hand-addressed, snail-mail, silly examples. I&#8217;d like to think Google are just doing what they legally have to do to be seen to maintain the trademark, without really wanting people to stop using the word casually. </p>
<p>I also think that so long as the people using it are actually referring to the use of Google, rather than another search engine, that it shouldn&#8217;t be seen as degrading their trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Marshall</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14078</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is an important issue for Google and a legitimate concern.  However, they are somewhat inconsistent in how they address it &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; the Pontiac commerical which says &quot;Google Pontiac!&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an important issue for Google and a legitimate concern.  However, they are somewhat inconsistent in how they address it <i>a la</i> the Pontiac commerical which says &#8220;Google Pontiac!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Giguere</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14077</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/08/google_looks_to_avoid_becoming_a_xerox_of_kleenex.php#comment-14077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In all fairness, John, trademark protection can be &lt;b&gt;lost&lt;/b&gt; if you don&#039;t actively police infringements. If their lawyers weren&#039;t sending these letters they&#039;d be neglecting their duties.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, John, trademark protection can be <b>lost</b> if you don&#8217;t actively police infringements. If their lawyers weren&#8217;t sending these letters they&#8217;d be neglecting their duties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
