<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Worth $1 BIllion? But Who Will Buy It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wnh</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-27784</link>
		<dc:creator>Wnh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-27784</guid>
		<description>that its core content is mostly copyrighted material. (I make this 
statement after being told as much by two very senior folks at major 
media companies who have studied content patterns on YouTube.)

So you&#039;ve never been there, but take this statement at face value? Typical blogger. Oh the content industry told me so, so it must be true.


&quot;Google doesn’t have it in its DNA to run a service like YouTube&quot;
Foot in mouth moment in history.

I bet you supported SOPA/PIPA. When elements of them get passed bit by bit (since the whole bag of worms got stopped) Ill keep this site in mind as I am abusing the provision of the average jackass to claim copyright and get the site taken down, and finances cut off.

&quot;being told as much by two very senior folks at major media companies who have studied content patterns on YouTube.&quot; - Stupid tool. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that its core content is mostly copyrighted material. (I make this<br />
statement after being told as much by two very senior folks at major<br />
media companies who have studied content patterns on YouTube.)</p>
<p>So you&#8217;ve never been there, but take this statement at face value? Typical blogger. Oh the content industry told me so, so it must be true.</p>
<p>&#8220;Google doesn’t have it in its DNA to run a service like YouTube&#8221;<br />
Foot in mouth moment in history.</p>
<p>I bet you supported SOPA/PIPA. When elements of them get passed bit by bit (since the whole bag of worms got stopped) Ill keep this site in mind as I am abusing the provision of the average jackass to claim copyright and get the site taken down, and finances cut off.</p>
<p>&#8220;being told as much by two very senior folks at major media companies who have studied content patterns on YouTube.&#8221; &#8211; Stupid tool. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Application Developers</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-27189</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Application Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-27189</guid>
		<description>I am really very much inspired and wanna say hats off to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really very much inspired and wanna say hats off to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john boy</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-25598</link>
		<dc:creator>john boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-25598</guid>
		<description>with videos like this on youtube it is clear they got a good buy... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBmBH3aTXbI </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with videos like this on youtube it is clear they got a good buy&#8230; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBmBH3aTXbI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBmBH3aTXbI</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So this was what YouTube was like in 06. My how things have changed. Oh and by the way, &quot;Google doesn&#039;t have it in its DNA to run a service like YouTube&quot; Ha. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this was what YouTube was like in 06. My how things have changed. Oh and by the way, &#8220;Google doesn&#8217;t have it in its DNA to run a service like YouTube&#8221; Ha. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motiono</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14283</link>
		<dc:creator>Motiono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Youtube surely was not worth the price tag Google paid for it and they know it as well however it was not really the money in the short term, this was more of a, elimination of a competition for Google, for once Google recognized the fact that Youtube is rising faster than Google Video, and Google&#039;s intentions were to make Google video a household name,  they also did not want a rising star that could result in news articles around the globe showing competition which would be a threat to Google&#039;s stock&#039;s value.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suppose it was more of a pyscological purchase rather than value based, i don&#039;t believe Youtube is delivering any profits for Google, if anything Youtube is probably consuming so much bandwidth that they are probably spending all of their revenues on bandwidth costs, but of course there is also the factor that Google has all the bandwidth and space stroage Youtube may need at a very reasonable cost, other video sharing sites such as Motiono have tackled this issue by outsourcing their video serving technologies to other companies, Motiono.com itself is probably the most efficient business model there is on the web to this date, it is operated by a single person ( Sumer Kolcak ) and in terms of competitiveness against Google and Youtube, well.. not really a competitor but they do their part in terms of being an alternative source when Youtube is not functioning properly or when the users want to embed a video on their myspace or blog instantly without having to wait for their video to be convert and processed ( as they currently do with Youtube and Google video ) , because Motiono converts and process the video while it uploads, and Youtube does not, this gives an edge to Motiono over Youtube, however Motiono does not stand a chance when it comes to having the power Google has and the competitiveness Google can create, Of course in the universe of the web, Google is a GOD, and motiono is simply a tiny star trying to glow just a little bit, as for the price tag on Youtube, well google made the correct move even if the pricing was high, because the growth potential was there and the threat of competition was there, so what else could google possible have done? jus seat there and pray? No, google has the most professional businessmen in the whole universe, they are thinking 24/7 in dozens globally,  water sleeps, google does not. I think Google is an awesome company even if they sometimes make competition a little bit unfair because Youtube is able to operate the way it does due to backing of Google, sites such as Motiono have difficulties competing with the unlimited resources Youtube has.  But everyone deserves their fair share of sucess, and Youtube is likely to blend into Google Video in time. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube surely was not worth the price tag Google paid for it and they know it as well however it was not really the money in the short term, this was more of a, elimination of a competition for Google, for once Google recognized the fact that Youtube is rising faster than Google Video, and Google&#8217;s intentions were to make Google video a household name,  they also did not want a rising star that could result in news articles around the globe showing competition which would be a threat to Google&#8217;s stock&#8217;s value.  </p>
<p>I suppose it was more of a pyscological purchase rather than value based, i don&#8217;t believe Youtube is delivering any profits for Google, if anything Youtube is probably consuming so much bandwidth that they are probably spending all of their revenues on bandwidth costs, but of course there is also the factor that Google has all the bandwidth and space stroage Youtube may need at a very reasonable cost, other video sharing sites such as Motiono have tackled this issue by outsourcing their video serving technologies to other companies, Motiono.com itself is probably the most efficient business model there is on the web to this date, it is operated by a single person ( Sumer Kolcak ) and in terms of competitiveness against Google and Youtube, well.. not really a competitor but they do their part in terms of being an alternative source when Youtube is not functioning properly or when the users want to embed a video on their myspace or blog instantly without having to wait for their video to be convert and processed ( as they currently do with Youtube and Google video ) , because Motiono converts and process the video while it uploads, and Youtube does not, this gives an edge to Motiono over Youtube, however Motiono does not stand a chance when it comes to having the power Google has and the competitiveness Google can create, Of course in the universe of the web, Google is a GOD, and motiono is simply a tiny star trying to glow just a little bit, as for the price tag on Youtube, well google made the correct move even if the pricing was high, because the growth potential was there and the threat of competition was there, so what else could google possible have done? jus seat there and pray? No, google has the most professional businessmen in the whole universe, they are thinking 24/7 in dozens globally,  water sleeps, google does not. I think Google is an awesome company even if they sometimes make competition a little bit unfair because Youtube is able to operate the way it does due to backing of Google, sites such as Motiono have difficulties competing with the unlimited resources Youtube has.  But everyone deserves their fair share of sucess, and Youtube is likely to blend into Google Video in time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdb</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14282</link>
		<dc:creator>mdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“We all now know that something radical has got to be done to turn back the tide of global warming. It is our hope and belief that the winner of The Virgin Earth Challenge will help to reverse the collision course our beautiful world is currently on.” Sir Richard Branson, 09.02.2007&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hi!&lt;br /&gt;
www.MillionDollarBorrower.com is launched! &lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the idea isn&#039;t so crazy after all? Anyway, I&#039;m gonna make some calls, send some emails and see if I can get some press interest! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What will I do with the money?&lt;br /&gt;
Design what I called “CO2 Neutralizer” (developing a plan for the final product) &amp; submit a commercially viable design capable of achieving the removal of significant volumes of anthropogenic, atmospheric greenhouse gases &lt;br /&gt;
You dream ‘CO2 Neutralizer?’ I have it! Check www.MillionDollarBorrower.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We all now know that something radical has got to be done to turn back the tide of global warming. It is our hope and belief that the winner of The Virgin Earth Challenge will help to reverse the collision course our beautiful world is currently on.” Sir Richard Branson, 09.02.2007</p>
<p>Hi!<br />
<a href="http://www.MillionDollarBorrower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MillionDollarBorrower.com</a> is launched! <br />
Perhaps the idea isn&#8217;t so crazy after all? Anyway, I&#8217;m gonna make some calls, send some emails and see if I can get some press interest! </p>
<p>What will I do with the money?<br />
Design what I called “CO2 Neutralizer” (developing a plan for the final product) &#038; submit a commercially viable design capable of achieving the removal of significant volumes of anthropogenic, atmospheric greenhouse gases <br />
You dream ‘CO2 Neutralizer?’ I have it! Check <a href="http://www.MillionDollarBorrower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MillionDollarBorrower.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chessman</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chessman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Youtube is a highly unreliable place to place your content or to build up a library. They are trigger happy and have a poor business model. In addition owners of material could gain revenues by placing ad content on their own sites and making all video in archives available and promoting music videos and theatrical trailers as a competent way to provide ad inf to promote artists they serve. We have seen them destroy entire libraries of posted high quality content, on a whim. Post elsewhere is our stern advice on youtube dealings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is a highly unreliable place to place your content or to build up a library. They are trigger happy and have a poor business model. In addition owners of material could gain revenues by placing ad content on their own sites and making all video in archives available and promoting music videos and theatrical trailers as a competent way to provide ad inf to promote artists they serve. We have seen them destroy entire libraries of posted high quality content, on a whim. Post elsewhere is our stern advice on youtube dealings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chessman</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14280</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chessman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Youtube is a highly unreliable place to place your content or to build up a library. They are trigger happy and have a poor business model. In addition owners of material could gain revenues by placing ad content on their own sites and making all video in archives available and promoting music videos and theatrical trailers as a competent way to provide ad inf to promote artists they serve. We have seen them destroy entire libraries of posted high quality content, on a whim. Post elsehwre is our stern advice on youtube dealings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is a highly unreliable place to place your content or to build up a library. They are trigger happy and have a poor business model. In addition owners of material could gain revenues by placing ad content on their own sites and making all video in archives available and promoting music videos and theatrical trailers as a competent way to provide ad inf to promote artists they serve. We have seen them destroy entire libraries of posted high quality content, on a whim. Post elsehwre is our stern advice on youtube dealings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bal-kes</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14279</link>
		<dc:creator>bal-kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 02:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the YT thing smells like &quot;who the dumber&quot; game. As long as there is someone dumber, we can keep it going&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the YT thing smells like &#8220;who the dumber&#8221; game. As long as there is someone dumber, we can keep it going</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/07/youtube_worth_1_billion_but_who_will_buy_it.php#comment-14278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, i guess you (original writer of the post) had thought wrong. As YouTube is now officially bought by Google for some $1.6 billion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well i dont think Google would pay more than a billion dollars if they dont think its worth it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i guess you (original writer of the post) had thought wrong. As YouTube is now officially bought by Google for some $1.6 billion.</p>
<p>Well i dont think Google would pay more than a billion dollars if they dont think its worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
