<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: Odd &#8211; Why Is Google Not Returning Results for &quot;Amazon.com&quot;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tophatsolutions</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14735</link>
		<dc:creator>tophatsolutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;redirections or it could be a bug than being anti-competitive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>redirections or it could be a bug than being anti-competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stravagante</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14734</link>
		<dc:creator>stravagante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if this one honors robots.txt and robots meta tags. Google&#039;s BlogSearch is iffy about that and was particularly bad about LiveJournal blogs when it first came into beta.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this one honors robots.txt and robots meta tags. Google&#8217;s BlogSearch is iffy about that and was particularly bad about LiveJournal blogs when it first came into beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sernak Plywood</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14733</link>
		<dc:creator>Sernak Plywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you search for amazon.co it gives the correct results is a &quot;See results for:&quot; section (amazon.com, amazon.co.uk and a9.com), but clicking that link gives you nothing again. Strange.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you search for amazon.co it gives the correct results is a &#8220;See results for:&#8221; section (amazon.com, amazon.co.uk and a9.com), but clicking that link gives you nothing again. Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergiy Kyrylkov</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14732</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergiy Kyrylkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a much bigger problem with Google that surfaced on June 27:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/35023.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/35023.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a much bigger problem with Google that surfaced on June 27:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/35023.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/35023.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14731</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14731</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have confirmed that there are no PPC ads showing up for the keyword &quot;amazon.com&quot; across Google US, Japan, Canada, and the UK. This was tested over 120 times over a period of 3 days. There are also no natural results other than Amazon.com appearing across any of those regions either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If there are other keywords you&#039;d like to test, post a comment and I&#039;ll run a report on them as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Richard Stokes&lt;br /&gt;
President, AdGooroo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.AdGooroo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.AdGooroo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,</p>
<p>I have confirmed that there are no PPC ads showing up for the keyword &#8220;amazon.com&#8221; across Google US, Japan, Canada, and the UK. This was tested over 120 times over a period of 3 days. There are also no natural results other than Amazon.com appearing across any of those regions either.</p>
<p>If there are other keywords you&#8217;d like to test, post a comment and I&#8217;ll run a report on them as well.</p>
<p>-Richard Stokes<br />
President, AdGooroo<br />
<a href="http://www.AdGooroo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.AdGooroo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vectorx</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14730</link>
		<dc:creator>Vectorx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with John and Chris. It is hard to see how a technical issue could affect a single domain name unless the search ranking algo contains or refers to domain names, ie. site-unique bias.  I think what happened is that Google inadvertently put Amazon on a &quot;bad sites&quot; list.  No doubt Amazon&#039;s problem will be immediately fixed.  Other sites that are also inadvertently penalized but do not have Amazon&#039;s clout won&#039;t be so fortunate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with John and Chris. It is hard to see how a technical issue could affect a single domain name unless the search ranking algo contains or refers to domain names, ie. site-unique bias.  I think what happened is that Google inadvertently put Amazon on a &#8220;bad sites&#8221; list.  No doubt Amazon&#8217;s problem will be immediately fixed.  Other sites that are also inadvertently penalized but do not have Amazon&#8217;s clout won&#8217;t be so fortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Running amazon.com in the Google search bar in Firefox is yielding one link:&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Amazon.com&lt;br /&gt;
Departments include books, music, videos, home and garden, electronics, and toys.&lt;br /&gt;
www.amazon.com/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But clicking through the Amazon link goes to an internal Amazon 404 message.  Very curious.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running amazon.com in the Google search bar in Firefox is yielding one link:</p>
<p>Amazon.com<br />
Departments include books, music, videos, home and garden, electronics, and toys.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/</a></p>
<p>But clicking through the Amazon link goes to an internal Amazon 404 message.  Very curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Blake</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14728</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#039;Technical Problem&#039; my *ss.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is quite possibly another example of Google beginning to use “site-unique bias” to suppress access by their users to sites that are not flavour of the month i.e &#039;not-a-friend-of-Google&#039;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is a very interesting report on this at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The report quotes the Kinderstart class action case as a typical example.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Site-unique bias is the overlaying of the algo of lists of domain names or other site-unique information ie unique strings. A negatively affected site may still show up in a search for “site:thedomain.com” but will come way down on any other search. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to this report, Google is moving away from censorship or banning to site-unique bias to avoid direct confrontation and possible legal issues with webmasters/site owners.  This way they can remove from view editorially undesirable (and perhaps competitive?) sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Technical Problem&#8217; my *ss.</p>
<p>This is quite possibly another example of Google beginning to use “site-unique bias” to suppress access by their users to sites that are not flavour of the month i.e &#8216;not-a-friend-of-Google&#8217;. </p>
<p>There is a very interesting report on this at <a href="http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/search_engine_censoring.html</a></p>
<p>The report quotes the Kinderstart class action case as a typical example.</p>
<p>Site-unique bias is the overlaying of the algo of lists of domain names or other site-unique information ie unique strings. A negatively affected site may still show up in a search for “site:thedomain.com” but will come way down on any other search. </p>
<p>According to this report, Google is moving away from censorship or banning to site-unique bias to avoid direct confrontation and possible legal issues with webmasters/site owners.  This way they can remove from view editorially undesirable (and perhaps competitive?) sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELLIS</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>ELLIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I looked up &lt;br /&gt;
HomeLivingSpaces.com&lt;br /&gt;
Found a few results, but nothing link google or amazon.&lt;br /&gt;
Do you thing the search engines are blocking my website??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked up <br />
HomeLivingSpaces.com<br />
Found a few results, but nothing link google or amazon.<br />
Do you thing the search engines are blocking my website??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14726</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/06/updated_odd_-_why_is_google_not_returning_results_for_amazoncom.php#comment-14726</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When you run this one&lt;br /&gt;
Find web pages that contain the term &quot;google.com&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Results 1 - 10 of about 187,000,000 for &quot;google.com&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now is Amazon going to sue google over this mishap&lt;br /&gt;
I get this from amazon.com search&lt;br /&gt;
www.amazon.fr/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you run this one<br />
Find web pages that contain the term &#8220;google.com&#8221;<br />
Results 1 &#8211; 10 of about 187,000,000 for &#8220;google.com&#8221;. </p>
<p>Now is Amazon going to sue google over this mishap<br />
I get this from amazon.com search<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.fr/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.fr/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
