<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Streamlined Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=streamlined_site</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Apple</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18039</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18039</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the changes, with the exception that the drop shadows appear both left and right. If you also had one on top (I see the one at the end of your pages) I would find it more balancing - but without one on top it seems odd that the shadows would fall on two sides at once. It makes me look and question this element, so I mention it as something that I consider a minor distraction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the changes, with the exception that the drop shadows appear both left and right. If you also had one on top (I see the one at the end of your pages) I would find it more balancing &#8211; but without one on top it seems odd that the shadows would fall on two sides at once. It makes me look and question this element, so I mention it as something that I consider a minor distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18038</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18038</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft Sans Serif is possibly one of the most Beautiful of the san serif fonts ever - it might be a consideration as a default Font&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Text colors could also a consideration&lt;/b&gt; - Continuous Black Text could be spiced up with an occassional color or two - perhaps very dark Blue or very dark green - &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, perhaps readers could start topics in a serparate area as   guests moderators&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Sans Serif is possibly one of the most Beautiful of the san serif fonts ever &#8211; it might be a consideration as a default Font</p>
<p><b><br />
Text colors could also a consideration</b> &#8211; Continuous Black Text could be spiced up with an occassional color or two &#8211; perhaps very dark Blue or very dark green &#8211; </p>
<p>Also, perhaps readers could start topics in a serparate area as   guests moderators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Johnson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18037</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/streamlined_site.php#comment-18037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The site is looking great.  It&#039;s like you stuck a drop shadow around the entire old look.  So, I guess you could say it&#039;s different, but it&#039;s just a better version of the same old site.  I like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is looking great.  It&#8217;s like you stuck a drop shadow around the entire old look.  So, I guess you could say it&#8217;s different, but it&#8217;s just a better version of the same old site.  I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
