<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Going P2P?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_going_p2p</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogish Baliga</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogish Baliga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;These are some what bogus sites. Google always provide Google Email Address (if logged in) and other links at the top-right corner. These sites are not providing those. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It may be a dirty trick by Google to get more traffic. Offcourse there is a brand damage here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some what bogus sites. Google always provide Google Email Address (if logged in) and other links at the top-right corner. These sites are not providing those. </p>
<p>Or </p>
<p>It may be a dirty trick by Google to get more traffic. Offcourse there is a brand damage here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patil</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17460</link>
		<dc:creator>patil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So have you folks had a look at these domains ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apply94.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apply94.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.apply94.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baidu-inc.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baidu-inc.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.baidu-inc.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boogybox.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boogybox.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boogybox.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cp658.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cp658.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cp658.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ikbss.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ikbss.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ikbss.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
All resolve to same Google.com IP address 64.233.187.99&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So how are these Non-Google domain names resolving to Google website ? Guess I have to go and attend Dr Im&#039;s networking class again ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So have you folks had a look at these domains ?<br />
<a href="http://www.apply94.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.apply94.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apply94.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.baidu-inc.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.baidu-inc.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.baidu-inc.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.boogybox.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.boogybox.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boogybox.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cp658.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.cp658.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cp658.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ikbss.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.ikbss.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ikbss.com/</a><br />
All resolve to same Google.com IP address 64.233.187.99</p>
<p>So how are these Non-Google domain names resolving to Google website ? Guess I have to go and attend Dr Im&#8217;s networking class again <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17459</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thousands of websites resolve to Google, I think this is reading too much into it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of websites resolve to Google, I think this is reading too much into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bryant</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17458</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publish.com/article2/0,1759,1906348,00.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;column &lt;/a&gt; about Google getting into P2P last month. Given how much they&#039;re trying to embed software on your desktop (Google Pack and Lexar USB drives), and given that they&#039;ve deployed Google Base to be a repository for information (and given the current upload method is a little rough around the edges), it only makes sense they would get into P2P. If nothing else, it would be another avenue around which to sell ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I wrote a <a href="http://www.publish.com/article2/0,1759,1906348,00.asp" rel="nofollow">column </a> about Google getting into P2P last month. Given how much they&#8217;re trying to embed software on your desktop (Google Pack and Lexar USB drives), and given that they&#8217;ve deployed Google Base to be a repository for information (and given the current upload method is a little rough around the edges), it only makes sense they would get into P2P. If nothing else, it would be another avenue around which to sell ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Pua</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17457</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Pua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2006/01/google_going_p2p.php#comment-17457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like sharelive.com&#039;s DNS servers are with zoneedit.com, which has a very easy to use web forward/re-direct feature, so it is most likely that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, the registrar is enom.com, not the usual one (MarkMonitor.com) that Google uses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like sharelive.com&#8217;s DNS servers are with zoneedit.com, which has a very easy to use web forward/re-direct feature, so it is most likely that.</p>
<p>Also, the registrar is enom.com, not the usual one (MarkMonitor.com) that Google uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
