http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/search_numbers.php?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=search_numbers Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more. Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/search_numbers.php#comment-18741 matt Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:31:16 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/search_numbers.php#comment-18741 <p>Here's a table Danny Sullivan produced that showed Google at 250 million per day back in February 2003. <br /> <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156461" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156461" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156461</a><br /> I haven't seen an update to this table -- but clearly this doesn't add up. Does anyone have accurate current numbers to share?</p> Here’s a table Danny Sullivan produced that showed Google at 250 million per day back in February 2003.
http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156461
I haven’t seen an update to this table — but clearly this doesn’t add up. Does anyone have accurate current numbers to share?

]]> http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/search_numbers.php#comment-18740 shaunc Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:37:27 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/search_numbers.php#comment-18740 <p>Doesn't that seem low? You <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002093.php" rel="nofollow">suggested</a> 250MM a day for Google a couple of weeks ago, and said it was an old number. What's NN's counting methodology? And who really knows how many queries Google, or anyone else, is processing?</p> Doesn’t that seem low? You suggested 250MM a day for Google a couple of weeks ago, and said it was an old number. What’s NN’s counting methodology? And who really knows how many queries Google, or anyone else, is processing?

]]>