<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&apos;s YAL (Yet Another Lawsuit)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronika</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18363</link>
		<dc:creator>chronika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What is so very hard to understand is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1- Google can afford the Best and Brightest Legal team of any company, anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2- They have the finances to thoroughly research any possible patents or gray areas before undertaking ANY new service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are they simply NOT researching possible disputes beforehand - or - deciding with a &quot;Let them Sue Us, if they can afford it :LOL &quot; attitude?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Money is not all @ search engine web&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ mike ... where can i view the patent lists&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is so very hard to understand is:</p>
<p>1- Google can afford the Best and Brightest Legal team of any company, anywhere.</p>
<p>2- They have the finances to thoroughly research any possible patents or gray areas before undertaking ANY new service.</p>
<p>Are they simply NOT researching possible disputes beforehand &#8211; or &#8211; deciding with a &#8220;Let them Sue Us, if they can afford it :LOL &#8221; attitude?</p>
<p>Money is not all @ search engine web</p>
<p>@ mike &#8230; where can i view the patent lists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Masnick</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you look at the actual patents you&#039;d understand why Google ignored them.  They have to do with least cost routing of telephone calls -- which has next to nothing to do with what Google Talk does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the actual patents you&#8217;d understand why Google ignored them.  They have to do with least cost routing of telephone calls &#8212; which has next to nothing to do with what Google Talk does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18361</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18361</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What is so very hard to understand is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; 1- Google can afford the Best and Brightest Legal team of any company, anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; 2- They have the finances to thoroughly research any possible patents or gray areas before undertaking ANY new service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are they simply NOT researching possible disputes beforehand - or - deciding with a &quot;Let them Sue Us, if they can afford it :LOL &quot; attitude?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have they made any endeavors to contact any of the patent holders for services they are developing, and perhaps ATTEMPT to work something out, beforehand?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt; Remember the &quot;Don&#039;t be Evil&quot; motto? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This adds some justification to patent holders who do file lawsuits - whether of not, the patent has been sitting around unused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Why didn&#039;t they just contact us and ASK to work something out!?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Years from now, it would NOT be surprising to see Google itself, filing a number of patent infringement suits, they feel others have violated!&lt;br /&gt;
 :( &lt;br /&gt;
 :-(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is so very hard to understand is:</p>
<p> 1- Google can afford the Best and Brightest Legal team of any company, anywhere.</p>
<p> 2- They have the finances to thoroughly research any possible patents or gray areas before undertaking ANY new service.</p>
<p>Are they simply NOT researching possible disputes beforehand &#8211; or &#8211; deciding with a &#8220;Let them Sue Us, if they can afford it :LOL &#8221; attitude?</p>
<p>Have they made any endeavors to contact any of the patent holders for services they are developing, and perhaps ATTEMPT to work something out, beforehand?</p>
<p><b> Remember the &#8220;Don&#8217;t be Evil&#8221; motto? </b></p>
<p>This adds some justification to patent holders who do file lawsuits &#8211; whether of not, the patent has been sitting around unused.<br />
<i>&#8220;Why didn&#8217;t they just contact us and ASK to work something out!?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Years from now, it would NOT be surprising to see Google itself, filing a number of patent infringement suits, they feel others have violated!<br />
 <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  <br />
 <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18360</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/12/its_yal_yet_another_lawsuit.php#comment-18360</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a very interesting recent piece from the New Yorker, talking about technology patents and litigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051226ta_talk_surowiecki&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051226ta_talk_surowiecki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a very interesting recent piece from the New Yorker, talking about technology patents and litigation.<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051226ta_talk_surowiecki" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051226ta_talk_surowiecki</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
