<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Google And TV Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on_google_and_tv_ads</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from Wholesale Furniture Brokers</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19456</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from Wholesale Furniture Brokers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This should be reviewed with their new YouTube acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be reviewed with their new YouTube acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Handley</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19455</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google will have significant push back from Mad Ave initially but logic will win eventually.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are so many smart Ecomm Groups in the Fortune 500 that feel agencies are holding them back. Cost too much. Are too cumbersome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This will be HUGE.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will have significant push back from Mad Ave initially but logic will win eventually.</p>
<p>There are so many smart Ecomm Groups in the Fortune 500 that feel agencies are holding them back. Cost too much. Are too cumbersome.</p>
<p>This will be HUGE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shoelover</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19454</link>
		<dc:creator>shoelover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The question is, are we going to see full 30/60 second spots or the the equivalent to current google adsense - short &quot;micro-ads&quot; relevant specifically to the demographics of the show, or possibly your web surfing habits - especially because this will all be IP based soon&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, are we going to see full 30/60 second spots or the the equivalent to current google adsense &#8211; short &#8220;micro-ads&#8221; relevant specifically to the demographics of the show, or possibly your web surfing habits &#8211; especially because this will all be IP based soon</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Kargaard Jensen</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19453</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Kargaard Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well it definitely could be a good idea to buy into Google: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most likely TV will also run over IP in the future. And Google is the one building the global sceleton for this currently.. including fiber optics and Wi-Fi to come. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it definitely could be a good idea to buy into Google: <br />
<a href="http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html" rel="nofollow">http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/2005/09/will-google-hurt-microsoft-with-free.html</a> </p>
<p>Most likely TV will also run over IP in the future. And Google is the one building the global sceleton for this currently.. including fiber optics and Wi-Fi to come. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19452</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/on_google_and_tv_ads.php#comment-19452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it makes sense for nearly all media outlets to switch to brokered ads.  Wouldn&#039;t it be nice for a network exec to be able to cut the expense of sales to concentrate on generating media people will watch?  By the same token, I expect that we would then see ABC and the NYT and the other big media outlets generating programming that would generate higher revenue.  Sigh.  Well I guess we would have sitcoms about mesothelioma that the networks really put their heart into.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;maybe we should all buy stock in Google and HBO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it makes sense for nearly all media outlets to switch to brokered ads.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice for a network exec to be able to cut the expense of sales to concentrate on generating media people will watch?  By the same token, I expect that we would then see ABC and the NYT and the other big media outlets generating programming that would generate higher revenue.  Sigh.  Well I guess we would have sitcoms about mesothelioma that the networks really put their heart into.</p>
<p>maybe we should all buy stock in Google and HBO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
