<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $94, er, $106 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=94_er_106_billion</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19631</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The thing I find most interesting is that they are spending aprox the same capex as Microsoft! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mean we have all heard the rumors: Google Wi-Fi, G-wallet (Google.com/purchase), G-bay (base.google.com). I mean maybe they teamed with NASA up their to put AdSense on the moon (not sure if contextual relavency or geo-targeting wins out in that algo; better ad &quot;get pics of the Moon here&quot; or &quot;Spacesuits-R-Us&quot;). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But seriously there is only some much to buy out there. $800 million dollars!!! Come on, someone tell me they aren&#039;t spending all that on beanbags and free redbull!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I find most interesting is that they are spending aprox the same capex as Microsoft! </p>
<p>I mean we have all heard the rumors: Google Wi-Fi, G-wallet (Google.com/purchase), G-bay (base.google.com). I mean maybe they teamed with NASA up their to put AdSense on the moon (not sure if contextual relavency or geo-targeting wins out in that algo; better ad &#8220;get pics of the Moon here&#8221; or &#8220;Spacesuits-R-Us&#8221;). </p>
<p>But seriously there is only some much to buy out there. $800 million dollars!!! Come on, someone tell me they aren&#8217;t spending all that on beanbags and free redbull!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bell</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19630</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On 9/21/05, Investor&#039;s Business Daily noted in its (password protected) Daily Stock analysis that GOOG was building a 2nd-stage base. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to (IBD founder) Bill O&#039;Neil&#039;s CAN SLIM investing philosophy, leading stocks often undergo powerful upsurges separated by three to four extended periods of base building. If true, what we are seeing now is GOOG&#039;s breakout from a 2nd base. Breakouts from the 3rd and 4th-stage bases are more tenuous. However, if GOOG continues to show such powerful earnings growth (a big &quot;if&quot;), this stock might still have legs for a while. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thing to watch out for is when all the pundits who are currently skeptics (the ones who are constantly amazed at GOOG&#039;s earnings surprises and stock action) begin to tout the stock as a can&#039;t loose proposition. That&#039;s probably the time to sell.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/21/05, Investor&#8217;s Business Daily noted in its (password protected) Daily Stock analysis that GOOG was building a 2nd-stage base. </p>
<p>According to (IBD founder) Bill O&#8217;Neil&#8217;s CAN SLIM investing philosophy, leading stocks often undergo powerful upsurges separated by three to four extended periods of base building. If true, what we are seeing now is GOOG&#8217;s breakout from a 2nd base. Breakouts from the 3rd and 4th-stage bases are more tenuous. However, if GOOG continues to show such powerful earnings growth (a big &#8220;if&#8221;), this stock might still have legs for a while. </p>
<p>The thing to watch out for is when all the pundits who are currently skeptics (the ones who are constantly amazed at GOOG&#8217;s earnings surprises and stock action) begin to tout the stock as a can&#8217;t loose proposition. That&#8217;s probably the time to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giri Cherukuri</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19629</link>
		<dc:creator>Giri Cherukuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some more tidbits...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google&#039;s stock price went up $36.70 or 12.1% on Friday to close at $339.90 in response to a strong earnings report after the close last night.  So what does this mean to Google&#039;s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin? The value of Page&#039;s stock holdings went up $1.241 billion and Brin&#039;s stock holdings rose $1.232 billion. Not bad for a day&#039;s work!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As of 10/18/05, Larry Page owns 33,804,785 shares of Google which are now worth $11,490,246,420 using Friday&#039;s closing stock price.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As of 10/5/05, Sergey Brin owns 33,576,435 shares of Google which are now worth $11,412,630,260 using Friday&#039;s closing stock price.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more tidbits&#8230;</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s stock price went up $36.70 or 12.1% on Friday to close at $339.90 in response to a strong earnings report after the close last night.  So what does this mean to Google&#8217;s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin? The value of Page&#8217;s stock holdings went up $1.241 billion and Brin&#8217;s stock holdings rose $1.232 billion. Not bad for a day&#8217;s work!</p>
<p>As of 10/18/05, Larry Page owns 33,804,785 shares of Google which are now worth $11,490,246,420 using Friday&#8217;s closing stock price.</p>
<p>As of 10/5/05, Sergey Brin owns 33,576,435 shares of Google which are now worth $11,412,630,260 using Friday&#8217;s closing stock price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serge lescouarnec</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19628</link>
		<dc:creator>serge lescouarnec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have used Google Ads for my business &#039;Montclair Concierges&#039; for over a year.&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the customers and prospects I get come through Google.&lt;br /&gt;
I get as many leads through Google Searches as with my Google ADS. &lt;br /&gt;
On the topic of Google profits, I noticed that in the past few months the minimum cost for my keywords has gone up quite a bit. It must be due to the classic supply and demand forces.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Serge Lescouarnec aka Serge the Concierge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montclairconcierges.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montclairconcierges.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.montclairconcierges.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My Blogs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://creativebusiness.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://creativebusiness.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://creativebusiness.typepad.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>I have used Google Ads for my business &#8216;Montclair Concierges&#8217; for over a year.<br />
Many of the customers and prospects I get come through Google.<br />
I get as many leads through Google Searches as with my Google ADS. <br />
On the topic of Google profits, I noticed that in the past few months the minimum cost for my keywords has gone up quite a bit. It must be due to the classic supply and demand forces.</p>
<p>Serge Lescouarnec aka Serge the Concierge<br />
<a href="http://www.montclairconcierges.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.montclairconcierges.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.montclairconcierges.com</a></p>
<p>My Blogs:<br />
<a href="http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://sergetheconcierge.typepad.com</a><br />
<a href="http://creativebusiness.typepad.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://creativebusiness.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://creativebusiness.typepad.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paulse</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19627</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still confused by the business motive of AdWords ranking.  Looking at the evidence, it would have taken someone an afternoon to implement a cyclic redundancy check (for non-geeks, this is just a simple way of obtaining a quasi-random &quot;hash value&quot; from a string) on ad text and keywords, and use the output of this as the AdWord ranking.  This appears to be the monetization result of the effort.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m assuming the original goal was to select ads that have a higher predicted click-through rate.  I&#039;m sure advertisers have a strong incentive to align their interests with the intended functionality of the AdWord ranker, which sounds like it definitely wasn&#039;t ready for prime time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still confused by the business motive of AdWords ranking.  Looking at the evidence, it would have taken someone an afternoon to implement a cyclic redundancy check (for non-geeks, this is just a simple way of obtaining a quasi-random &#8220;hash value&#8221; from a string) on ad text and keywords, and use the output of this as the AdWord ranking.  This appears to be the monetization result of the effort.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming the original goal was to select ads that have a higher predicted click-through rate.  I&#8217;m sure advertisers have a strong incentive to align their interests with the intended functionality of the AdWord ranker, which sounds like it definitely wasn&#8217;t ready for prime time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19626</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With these revenues, what&#039;s the chance of Google cracking down on AdSense spam?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is AsSense going to be part of relevancy interest or investor interest?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With these revenues, what&#8217;s the chance of Google cracking down on AdSense spam?</p>
<p>Is AsSense going to be part of relevancy interest or investor interest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paulse</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19625</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is this (http://www.threadwatch.org/node/4342) the development Zack mentioned?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this (<a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/4342" rel="nofollow">http://www.threadwatch.org/node/4342</a>) the development Zack mentioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paulse</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19624</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Zack.  I certainly believe this (look at who google hires), but it&#039;s a little contradictory that there are so many people offering services meant to improve the use of AdSense.  Perhaps this will wipe out some of that business.  All indications are that there will be a lot of handholding necessary once Madison Ave. starts their pilgrimage west.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any guesses for how much of Google&#039;s revenue is driven by fraudulent activity (clicks/splogs)?  AdSense customers waive Google from any liability when they sign up, and reports say Google are the worst of the big 3 in providing data for a customer to use in tracking down culprits.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Zack.  I certainly believe this (look at who google hires), but it&#8217;s a little contradictory that there are so many people offering services meant to improve the use of AdSense.  Perhaps this will wipe out some of that business.  All indications are that there will be a lot of handholding necessary once Madison Ave. starts their pilgrimage west.</p>
<p>Any guesses for how much of Google&#8217;s revenue is driven by fraudulent activity (clicks/splogs)?  AdSense customers waive Google from any liability when they sign up, and reports say Google are the worst of the big 3 in providing data for a customer to use in tracking down culprits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19623</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John - since you brought up the number of shares you own (zero), why haven&#039;t you bought any GOOGle stock yet? Have I missed your post on this one?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; since you brought up the number of shares you own (zero), why haven&#8217;t you bought any GOOGle stock yet? Have I missed your post on this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19622</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/10/94_er_106_billion.php#comment-19622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The truth is Geeks &amp; bloggers seldom click on sponsored links but the general public dont care and most of them dont even know they are clicking an advertisement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is another reason why the new advertisement dependent Web 2.0 services should get out of the geek crowd and become mainstream soon!.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is Geeks &#038; bloggers seldom click on sponsored links but the general public dont care and most of them dont even know they are clicking an advertisement.</p>
<p>This is another reason why the new advertisement dependent Web 2.0 services should get out of the geek crowd and become mainstream soon!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
