<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&apos;s A Long Tail, But A Very Short Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20130</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This article clearly states the mindset of the author.&lt;a / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&quot;&gt;john&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article clearly states the mindset of the author.<a / rel="nofollow"><br />
&#8220;>john</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Trachtenberg</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20129</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Trachtenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 06:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since eBay just bought Shopping.com, that makes eBay&#039;s combined share of search sponsored linked 5x the size of anybody else -- and I bet that doesn&#039;t include affiliate numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since eBay just bought Shopping.com, that makes eBay&#8217;s combined share of search sponsored linked 5x the size of anybody else &#8212; and I bet that doesn&#8217;t include affiliate numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20128</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, sorry about that! We&#039;ve corrected that. Still a huge number to me, a 1/3 of all ad impressions off of search. And Yahoo is the fifth biggest buyer of search ads? That including on Yahoo itself? On Google? I want to know more :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, sorry about that! We&#8217;ve corrected that. Still a huge number to me, a 1/3 of all ad impressions off of search. And Yahoo is the fifth biggest buyer of search ads? That including on Yahoo itself? On Google? I want to know more <img src='http://battellemedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Anderson</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/09/its_a_long_tail_but_a_very_short_head.php#comment-20127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John, I think SEW may have misread the release. As I read it, those three account for less than 4% of sponsored link impressions. It&#039;s the overall total of search sponsored links (those three companies plus 15,000 others) that accounted for 34% of online advertising impressions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I think SEW may have misread the release. As I read it, those three account for less than 4% of sponsored link impressions. It&#8217;s the overall total of search sponsored links (those three companies plus 15,000 others) that accounted for 34% of online advertising impressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
