Comments on: Google Announces New Index Size, Shifts Focus from Counting

By: transseksuel

transseksuel — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:34:44 +0000

ometimes chose between your search results and indicate which web site is most useful while at the same time indicating whether that web site fell in the top ten results or not.

By: travesti

travesti — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:34:04 +0000

It would be valuable if you would sometimes chose between your search results and indicate which web site is most useful while at the same time indicating whether that web site fell in the top ten results or not.

By: websurfer

websurfer — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:33:45 +0000

If to talk about google index anв its following analysis i’ve come across a great tool called SERPalyzer. I wouldn’t mind having John Battelle review it. It’s not an ad in any possible way. I just got excited when I discovered it – the small tool lets you analyze goole serach results without leaving the google page. Pretty cool.

By: Lektury

Lektury — Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:12:16 +0000

or me, I wish “everyone” would focus their energies on reducing the non efective parts of the engines algo’s ~ that of combatting spam etc. The sheer wate of resourceful computing power will always be a thorn in the backside of relevancy advancement.

By: online directory main

online directory main — Tue, 09 May 2006 11:40:33 +0000

hello! http://www.dirare.com/Sweden/ online directory. About DIRare, Search in Business Category, Yellowpages search. From online directory .

By: Telewizory Lcd

Telewizory Lcd — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:31:26 +0000

I attend that Kendall Willets is right, google wants to have much pages but begins to forget about qualities, gives me oneself that their idea from page rank is too weak for yes large quantities of pages .

By: webtools

webtools — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:23:35 +0000

Google is starting to admit defeat on the quality of it’s search engine. How interesting…

By: doro

doro — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:22:14 +0000

For me, I wish “everyone” would focus their energies on reducing the non efective parts of the engines algo’s ~ that of combatting spam etc. The sheer wate of resourceful computing power will always be a thorn in the backside of relevancy advancement.

By: JDA

JDA — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:56:48 +0000

Google had 8 billion pages, now has 3x anyone else – which is presumably 60 billion pages; there really wasn’t much that I couldn’t find before that would be possible to find now (the deep web still exists) so essentially Google added 52 billion useless documents. Not to mention, chances are that if Google didn’t crawl these documents before they’re probably not SEO ideal and they won’t be highly positioned for any common query, therefore even though the documents are there they still won’t get viewed (who goes passed the 3rd serp?)
Even if Google lost the indexing war – who cares? Search as we know it is becoming passe(why else would Google be making all of these brand extensions). It’s time for new technologies to refine the process and organize the world’s information in even more useful ways.

By: andrew

andrew — Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:21:54 +0000

I like the new google look on the occasion of its 7th b’day.