<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch: Late to the Search Party, But He&apos;s Bringing Lots of Booze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20402</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well it&#039;s been 12 months since this topic hit the headlines but Murdoch still hasn&#039;t bought his search engine.&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that he has signed Google to Myspace doesn&#039;t change his plans, because Google are only providing search results to one site.&lt;br /&gt;
Given that Looksmart&#039;s institutional ownership has now grown to 52% I think they are still the prime canidate.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess we&#039;ll see soon enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s been 12 months since this topic hit the headlines but Murdoch still hasn&#8217;t bought his search engine.<br />
The fact that he has signed Google to Myspace doesn&#8217;t change his plans, because Google are only providing search results to one site.<br />
Given that Looksmart&#8217;s institutional ownership has now grown to 52% I think they are still the prime canidate.<br />
I guess we&#8217;ll see soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitar Vesselinov</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitar Vesselinov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20401</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; News Corp&#039;s Rupert Murdoch discusses search plans (NWS 4Q05 conf call quotes)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;....As for search, we&#039;re not prepared to announce that, yet, other than to say we&#039;re in various plans of negotiations to buy a controlling interest in a, what we think is a wonderful search engine, but you will think an insignificant price.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;....competition with Google. Google is a pure search company. We&#039;re talking about the media here. So I guess if you want to read into it, you can look at competition with Yahoo!, although we don&#039;t see why we can&#039;t live side by side with them very well. This is an area of enormous growth and there&#039;s room for a lot more than one or two players.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetstockblog.com/2005/08/murdoch_discuss.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.internetstockblog.com/2005/08/murdoch_discuss.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> News Corp&#8217;s Rupert Murdoch discusses search plans (NWS 4Q05 conf call quotes)</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;.As for search, we&#8217;re not prepared to announce that, yet, other than to say we&#8217;re in various plans of negotiations to buy a controlling interest in a, what we think is a wonderful search engine, but you will think an insignificant price.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;.competition with Google. Google is a pure search company. We&#8217;re talking about the media here. So I guess if you want to read into it, you can look at competition with Yahoo!, although we don&#8217;t see why we can&#8217;t live side by side with them very well. This is an area of enormous growth and there&#8217;s room for a lot more than one or two players.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.internetstockblog.com/2005/08/murdoch_discuss.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetstockblog.com/2005/08/murdoch_discuss.html</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20400</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If they do buy Looksmart they would also get Furl, which could figure in with their buyout of MySpace. They&#039;d have 2 impressive social networking services that can be combined to create an even more impressive service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looksmart also has WiseNut which is a nice looking search engine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they do buy Looksmart they would also get Furl, which could figure in with their buyout of MySpace. They&#8217;d have 2 impressive social networking services that can be combined to create an even more impressive service.</p>
<p>Looksmart also has WiseNut which is a nice looking search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20399</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/murdoch_late_to_the_search_party_but_hes_bringing_lots_of_booze.php#comment-20399</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve been misinformed.  It turns out that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feedblog.org/2005/08/news_corp_to_bu.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;News Corp is going to buy Google and I have proof!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John!</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been misinformed.  It turns out that <a href="http://www.feedblog.org/2005/08/news_corp_to_bu.html" rel="nofollow">News Corp is going to buy Google and I have proof!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
