Comments on: Google Talk http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google_talk Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more. Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Jeffrey McManus http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20314 Jeffrey McManus Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:12:29 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20314 <p>A mediocre chat client isn't "community" no matter what definition of the term you use.</p> A mediocre chat client isn’t “community” no matter what definition of the term you use.

]]> By: Neel Dhamdhere http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20313 Neel Dhamdhere Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:09:05 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20313 <p>Interesting! Same Google clean n' crisp feel to the Talk client. Was expecting to see search integrated into the client. <br /> </p> Interesting! Same Google clean n’ crisp feel to the Talk client. Was expecting to see search integrated into the client.

]]> By: kyle http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20312 kyle Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:09:45 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20312 <p>I'm kinda bummed. Given how awesome google maps and desktop were I was expecting more. The voice part sounds good, but it's otherwise pretty much featureless and the fact that I can add clients of other services like AIM and Yahoo (ala trillian and qnext) is a signifigant bummer.</p> I’m kinda bummed. Given how awesome google maps and desktop were I was expecting more. The voice part sounds good, but it’s otherwise pretty much featureless and the fact that I can add clients of other services like AIM and Yahoo (ala trillian and qnext) is a signifigant bummer.

]]> By: jr http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20311 jr Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:43:13 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20311 <p>Meh, cutting edge 1995 technology. Seriously, this is what they've been working on for three years?</p> <p>Ah well, at least slashdot won't have to write their own chat client now.</p> Meh, cutting edge 1995 technology. Seriously, this is what they’ve been working on for three years?

Ah well, at least slashdot won’t have to write their own chat client now.

]]> By: Jordan Running http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20310 Jordan Running Wed, 24 Aug 2005 03:12:07 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20310 <p>Sorry, here's the clickable link:</p> <p><a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2005/08/23/googe-talk-review/" rel="nofollow">Google Talk Review</a> at Download Squad.</p> Sorry, here’s the clickable link:

Google Talk Review at Download Squad.

]]> By: Jordan Running http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20309 Jordan Running Wed, 24 Aug 2005 03:11:14 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/08/google_talk.php#comment-20309 <p>John, I think you'll be interested in our review of the official Google Talk client, complete with screenshots, at Download Squad: <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2005/08/23/googe-talk-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.downloadsquad.com/2005/08/23/googe-talk-review/</a></p> John, I think you’ll be interested in our review of the official Google Talk client, complete with screenshots, at Download Squad: http://www.downloadsquad.com/2005/08/23/googe-talk-review/

]]>