<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawk on Image Search and Photo Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php#comment-20739</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php#comment-20739</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, image tagging asks for an idea of image search site. On one hand you have a great community of people sharing their photos and talking about them - and it&#039;s good to have activity, it brings life to the site, on the other hand you somehow need to surf through and search for the &quot;best&quot; photos in all this insane quantity of photos.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s &quot;smart&quot; to show the image search results on site other than the main photo share site but is it fair to merely show those pictures? I wouldn&#039;t like my photos to be taken by somebody from the search engine without reading my description and all the comments my friends leave.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Probably, it&#039;s better to have photo share site with _advanced_ and _smart_ search and promote the site for both terms.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, image tagging asks for an idea of image search site. On one hand you have a great community of people sharing their photos and talking about them &#8211; and it&#8217;s good to have activity, it brings life to the site, on the other hand you somehow need to surf through and search for the &#8220;best&#8221; photos in all this insane quantity of photos.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;smart&#8221; to show the image search results on site other than the main photo share site but is it fair to merely show those pictures? I wouldn&#8217;t like my photos to be taken by somebody from the search engine without reading my description and all the comments my friends leave.</p>
<p>Probably, it&#8217;s better to have photo share site with _advanced_ and _smart_ search and promote the site for both terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tsenbor</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php#comment-20738</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tsenbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/hawk_on_image_search_and_photo_sites.php#comment-20738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly enough I&#039;ve seen similar funcitonality on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shutterpoint.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shutterpoint.com&lt;/a&gt; which is a great stock photography site. Members of the site upload images for sale and rate them based on the quality (according to their personla views). Image search developed by Shutterpoint takes into account the ratings provided by users and keywords when returning the search results which during my tests performed very well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough I&#8217;ve seen similar funcitonality on <a href="http://www.shutterpoint.com" rel="nofollow">Shutterpoint.com</a> which is a great stock photography site. Members of the site upload images for sale and rate them based on the quality (according to their personla views). Image search developed by Shutterpoint takes into account the ratings provided by users and keywords when returning the search results which during my tests performed very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
